High Court blow for UK homeowners

chucky

just for your benefit !!!!!! - it makes very accurate reading.

Dithering_Dad wrote: »

Excellent, you can join !!!!!! as one of the people who make a great song and dance about putting people on ignore and then always being the first to comment on whatever they say. :rotfl:

I'll be amazed if 'abuse' do anything about my post. Everything in there is true. !!!!!! did try defend his view that it's aceptable to call black people 'negros', he did try and defend his view that it's acceptable to call disabled people 'retards' and he does revel in the misfortunes of others on a regular basis.

Perhaps you could enlighten us on which part of my post was abusive? Or are you one of the many people on MSE who come on onto an internet forum and are appalled when people have the temerity to hold a viewpoint contrary to yours?

I see !!!!!! and his 'mates' are now rushing to abaxas's aid. They hate the fact that this part of the forum is now attracting caring people who take offense to views that people should be turfed out into the streets, even if their financial problems are caused by illnesses such as leukemia. It beggars belief and you lot should be ashamed of yourselves, especially you MissMoneyPenny. You're a disgrace and I will be putting you on 'ignore'. You are history's greatest monster!!! :mad:

carolt

chucky wrote: »

yes Carol - you're right the links that are previously posted on this thread do not exist and I made them. they don't exist.

Posts 120 and 124 on this thread to be exact.
Let me add a couple of these, because I'm finding you funny :rotfl: :rotfl:

Maybe if you didn't lie carol and make things up in your posts - I'd be even more inclined to believe you but you are what you are Carol. No-one will ever be able to change that, not even your husband...

Apologies - when I tried clicking on the link a couple of minutes ago, it came up with 'no link' - don't know why.

It is now letting me see a link.

Having had a link at the lengthy thread where the term 'retard' is used, discussion appears to revolve around a post by Treadmil, which has - I thinkbeen reported and removed. Making it impossible to get an idea of what was under discussion. Without knowing what any of the posters were vresponding to, I can't tell who was over-reacting and who was behaving reasonably.

!!!!!! does not appear to be the person who itroduced the word or topic, though he did comment on it, as did many others. Likewise, it appears to be DD who actually introduced the 'n' word.

So I am not really any clearer who said what or why than I was before.

Thanks for the links.

!!! you have just accused me of 'lying', I'd like chapter and verse on exactly where I did that thanks.

I don't find that very funny. I am scrupulously honest.

You may not like what I write, but that doesn't make your smears acceptable.

chucky

Carol - I'm not replying to you anymore on this topic.
I have proved that you selectively read and choose to see what you want.

I did really believe that you were sincere but after this episode it's just proves the point that you're not. i'm sorry to see that.

Dithering_Dad

Just so everyone knows the script....

1. !!!!!! attacks someone - in this case it was myself. He was not involved in the original discussion whatsoever and simply joined in to have a go at a forum member that he dislikes.

2. The person !!!!!! attacks responds.

3. !!!!!! and his friends (aka his alternate logon ids) join in the attack.

4. !!!!!! gets the worst of it and runs off crying saying that he's sick of all the trolls on this website.

We've so far had steps 1 thru 3 and I'm just waiting for step 4 to appear.

What is interesting is that it seems more people are wise to !!!!!! and his snidely ways and are prepared to stand up and be counted. Well done I say.

carolt

Oh grow up DD - !!!!!! and I hardly one and the same...

You could have just responded by posting a link.

carolt

chucky wrote: »

Carol - I'm not replying to you anymore on this topic.
I have proved that you selectively read and choose to see what you want.

I did really believe that you were sincere but after this episode it's just proves the point that you're not. i'm sorry to see that.

What a surprise - you can't find any links to where I lied - because there aren't any - and have to resort to personal abuse instead.

I'm disappointed in you too, chucky, but not surprised.

Sadly.

Dithering_Dad

so could you carol. You've repeatedly accused me of a list of forum crimes, yet posted no links of your own. Or is it just other people who have to provide links to back up their accusations?

carolt

Now time to return to the subject of this thread.

Anyone?

carolt

Dithering_Dad wrote: »

so could you carol. You've repeatedly accused me of a list of forum crimes, yet no links of your own. Or is it just other people who have to provide links?

Oh for goodness sake, what 'crimes' have I accused you of?

Dithering_Dad

Carolt and !!!!!! are two cheeks of the same ar se.

It has been suggested several times that they are having some sort of PM relationship. I couldn't comment on that, except to say that if it's true and they do swap racy PMs then my only concern would be about the fact that carol has children and a husband and I think they should be considered.

I know some people think PM flirting is just a bit of fun, but people can get hurt. Think of the children.