High Court blow for UK homeowners

carolt

Your link is mythical chucky - I posted my post at the same time as yours, hence did not respond to it, as I hadn't yet seen it.

But now I have, and have tried your link - it doesn't work.

So - still nothing.

As DD has been guilty of these things before - and I know, because he's tried doing it to me, too - I'll assume !!!!!! is innocent on this.

As I said, you have a track record of twisting things too, to suit your own particular viewpoint, so your non-existent 'evidence' seems rather dubious to me.

Maybe if you generally posted more sensibly, I'd be more inclined to believe you? :rolleyes:

Just a thought.

chucky

yes Carol - you're right the links that are previously posted on this thread do not exist and I made them. they don't exist.

Posts 120 and 124 on this thread to be exact.
Let me add a couple of these, because I'm finding you funny :rotfl: :rotfl:

Maybe if you didn't lie carol and make things up in your posts - I'd be even more inclined to believe you but you are what you are Carol. No-one will ever be able to change that, not even your husband...

Really2

neverdespairgirl wrote: »

Yes, and no.

But I did work as a law clerk for the 6 months before I started pupillage (2001) doing both mortgage and rental possession hearings, an average of 12 - 13 a week.

No offence but 2001 is a long time ago now.
But my point was that i belive that homowns and tenants should recive the same "state help" which I think they do I do not think either receive special treatment from the state.

But back to the OP it is easier for a renter to not pay and disapear than a home owner. i do not think renting or owning is iresponsable or should have a morally superior tag.

neverdespairgirl

Really2 wrote: »

No offence but 2001 is a long time ago now.

The case law and ways courts deal with it haven't changed significantly.

OH is a director of a law centre, which deals with a lot of repossessions.

WTF?_2

MissMoneypenny wrote: »

I never thought I would be putting a poster on ignore, but after reading this venomous, deranged rantings, I now have my first on ignore.

I've reported this post to abuse too.

I put DD on ignore a long time back.

He has the habit of making the most incredibly personal and spiteful posts - rather strange considering this is just a bunch of anonymous strangers debating and discussing on the internet.

He also (along with Chucky who exhibits very similar tendancies) has a history of going back later on to edit or remove their posts which cast them in rather a poor light.

It's rather telling that most of the personal accusations that Chucky and DD make, I would have attributed to them based on posting style (bashing others, talking up themselves). I guess psychological projection does exist.


It is a real pain that you can't have a robust debate without weirdos busting in but this is the internet. A shame that MSE doesn't do more to take action but as we have seen, it's easy for the poster to just get an alternate identity and resume the verbal abuse. Just better to use the ignore function in my opinion. At first you are termpted to peek but once you realise how much more pleasant the experience is without a constant war of attrition you soon realise that there's little point debating with people who obviously have 'issues'.

Really2

Carol what about this.

!!!!!!? wrote: »

Since only a complete fupping idiot would be happier that they saddled themselves with a large debt on an overpriced property going into a recession that is looking like it will be deflationary instead of selling a property at the peak and banking a healthy cash profit, I have to conclude you are trolling again.

Well, actually, since your sock puppet was created a week or so back you've done nothing but troll.

There are plenty of people on here who are worried because they had their money in Icesave. Even though they'll get it back, they will face uncertainty and stress and the last thing they need is a grade-A trolling muppet like yourself coming on to wind them up whilst feigning concern.

Now be a good troll and jog on. :rolleyes:

This is a day after I had £1.5K stuck in icesave and making a genuine post about feeling more secure with my mortgage than my savings at that time.

The guy is not embassador of tolerance and without offence.

WTF?_2

carolt wrote: »

Your link is mythical chucky - I posted my post at the same time as yours, hence did not respond to it, as I hadn't yet seen it.

But now I have, and have tried your link - it doesn't work.

So - still nothing.

As DD has been guilty of these things before - and I know, because he's tried doing it to me, too - I'll assume !!!!!! is innocent on this.

As I said, you have a track record of twisting things too, to suit your own particular viewpoint, so your non-existent 'evidence' seems rather dubious to me.

Maybe if you generally posted more sensibly, I'd be more inclined to believe you? :rolleyes:

Just a thought.

All the posts I've ever made on MSE are still there unless removed by a mod.

To my knowledge the only one that was, was a post about me visualising Pickled Pink looking a bit like Patsy from AbFab (with a suitable picture link).

Dithering_Dad

carolt wrote: »

I say this as someone who has been selectively misquoted - or just downright made up - by DD in the past, hence my scepticism.....

Links please carol. You may be deliberately missing the irony in making a post about hearsay and then throwing in some of your own. You are the great twister on MSE, not me.

The other great irony is that !!!!!! goes on about other people deleting their posts (to hide their shame :rolleyes:), yet if any of !!!!!! posts are deleted, then they must have been deleted by Mods.

Yeah, !!!!!!, we believe you :rolleyes:

chucky

!!!!!!? wrote: »

He also (along with Chucky who exhibits very similar tendancies) has a history of going back later on to edit or remove their posts which cast them in rather a poor light.

That's very, very funny - please explain how 11 of your posts have mysteriously disappeared !!!!!!. If it were the mods because there would have been a message to indicate this. Funny that you accuse others of deleting when you do the same... Sad...

!!!!!!? wrote: »

I guess psychological projection does exist.

You're an online psyco analyst as well as living off your parents. What a great single lonely man that you are!!

chucky

Really - Carol will see this post as mythical!!!

There are many, many others - she obviously doesn't see them

Don't worry though - !!!!!! and Carol will be busy sending PM's to their Thanking buddies as we speak to get them onto this thread.