We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Does it cost more to have heating & water on?

dawnie1972
Posts: 2,428 Forumite


I normally have my water on for an hour in the morning, then i have my heating on in the morning and at night, however my 3 port valve has packed up and the heating is only working if i have the water on - what i would like to know is, will it use more oil to have the water and heating on that it would to just have the heating on?
A home is not a home ..... without a dog 

0
Comments
-
Yes it will, but not a huge amount more.
A fully lagged tank kept heated 24/7 will lose about 3kWh a day.
So you keeping it on at the same time as your heating, shouldn't use more than about 2kWh a day. Between 10p to 20p a day depending on your boiler efficiency and the price you pay for oil.0 -
The usual problem with a motorised 3 Port valve is the motor that operates the valve, but this is virtually a plug-in componant for which spares are available at a cost of, depending on your type, around £50. Fixing it or having it fixed is worthwhile - programming our boiler to produce hot water only for 30 mins at 6am yealds a full storage tank of hot water that will deliver 2 showers & a bath during the day, has cut my oil consumption by 27%. The downside is that to programme this function the Heating has to set on 'Constant' and controlled by the room thermostat, which means it's a bit chilly first thing on winter mornings for the first one out of bed, which is usually me, but I'm the one paying the oil bill.0
-
Depending on the length of pipework between the boiler and the hot water tank and the lagging of this pipe it is cheaper to heat your water via an electric emersion heater there is a lot of losses between the boiler and the water in the tank. I always use the electric heater rather than oil when I am not using the central heating as this in my view is more efficient than heating the water up in the boiler transporting it via an electric pump to the hot water tank and then transfering the heat from the water through a copper pipe into the water in the tank which add up to a lot of losses.0
-
Depending on the length of pipework between the boiler and the hot water tank and the lagging of this pipe it is cheaper to heat your water via an electric emersion heater there is a lot of losses between the boiler and the water in the tank. I always use the electric heater rather than oil when I am not using the central heating as this in my view is more efficient than heating the water up in the boiler transporting it via an electric pump to the hot water tank and then transfering the heat from the water through a copper pipe into the water in the tank which add up to a lot of losses.
Your theory would not be true in most properties!:doh: Blue text on this forum usually signifies hyperlinks, so click on them!..:wall:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards