We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PPI Reclaiming discussion Part III
Comments
-
I would ask them to send you a written form of calculations, to make sure the amounts are correct.
Did they admit it was mis sold hun ?;)
Some prefer the cash paid directly to them, although some finance companies if the loan is still active will state they will do this to reduce the loan, but in my opinion, if this was mis sold, I would write to them to ask them to pay it directly back to you.;)
Thanks, once I get written confirmation I will tell them I want a cash refund instead and see what they say. Am also trying to claim back for earlier car finance with them - when I surrendered the car after 2 years (which you can at "no additional cost" they pursued me for the other 2 years of PPI and I was told when taking out the loan that I could not get the loan without the PPI so fingers crossed! i was amazed to get a pleasant phone call from Welcome informing me of all that they had done - I was waiting to be told where to go!0 -
marshallka wrote: »Tylerlewis, what are the details from the loan they are redressing. What is on the agreement actually including all figures and also the APR, monthly payments and interest figs etc...
They are redressing both of them but cant find the agreements.
1st loan I pay £175.99 a month over 60 months. Have got 18 months left on it at APR 17.5%. This was for £6000
2nd loan I pay £114.60 a month over 48 months. Have got 32 months left on it at APR 35.9%. This was for £30000 -
Just wanted to repost this
transitional arrangements for insurance intermediaries
In issue 42 of ombudsman news, we noted that our jurisdiction has recently expanded to include insurance intermediaries. This article outlines the insurance intermediary activities that are now covered by the Financial Ombudsman Service. It also explains the arrangements for dealing with relevant transitional complaints – those that concern events that occurred before insurance intermediaries joined our jurisdiction.
firms within our jurisdiction
From 14 January 2005, the following activities became regulated by the Financial Services Authority (and therefore fell within our jurisdiction):
This means that many firms which carried out such activities and were previously outside our jurisdiction – such as insurance brokers – are now covered by the ombudsman scheme. We also have jurisdiction over firms that have been granted interim permission by the Financial Services Authority to carry out general insurance mediation activities.
There are a few specific exceptions to this extension of our jurisdiction:
retrospective jurisdiction
As well as having jurisdiction over complaints about events occurring on or after 14 January 2005, the Financial Ombudsman Service also has a limited ‘retrospective’ jurisdiction. This covers some complaints about events that occurred before 14 January 2005. The retrospective jurisdiction comes about because of provisions set out in a statutory instrument informally known as The Mortgage & General Insurance Transitional Order. The Order allows us to look at complaints about intermediary activities that occurred before 14 January 2005 if:
Such complaints are known as relevant transitional complaints. While we will determine them in line with our ‘fair and reasonable’ jurisdiction, we must also take into account what the General Insurance Standards Council might have decided. We will not have jurisdiction over any complaints that the Council was already handling before 14 January 2005. Our usual time limits will apply.
In a future issue of ombudsman news we will include case studies illustrating some of the jurisdiction issues surrounding transitional arrangements for intermediaries. In the meantime the following flow chart should help to clarify which retrospective complaints we are able to look at.0 -
I would ask them to send you a written form of calculations, to make sure the amounts are correct.
Did they admit it was mis sold hun ?;)
Some prefer the cash paid directly to them, although some finance companies if the loan is still active will state they will do this to reduce the loan, but in my opinion, if this was mis sold, I would write to them to ask them to pay it directly back to you.;)0 -
Thanks, once I get written confirmation I will tell them I want a cash refund instead and see what they say. Am also trying to claim back for earlier car finance with them - when I surrendered the car after 2 years (which you can at "no additional cost" they pursued me for the other 2 years of PPI and I was told when taking out the loan that I could not get the loan without the PPI so fingers crossed! i was amazed to get a pleasant phone call from Welcome informing me of all that they had done - I was waiting to be told where to go!
Good luck with this Fifi, they should pay this directly to you in my opinion anyway hun.;)
Post the cals on here if you want to, when you have them.
Di
XThe one and only "Dizzy Di"0 -
tylerlewis wrote: »They are redressing both of them but cant find the agreements.
1st loan I pay £175.99 a month over 60 months. Have got 18 months left on it at APR 17.5%. This was for £6000
2nd loan I pay £114.60 a month over 48 months. Have got 32 months left on it at APR 35.9%. This was for £30000 -
-
:j Let him who be deceived ,be deceived:j0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards