We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House deeds - who should hold them?
Options

Watson
Posts: 239 Forumite


Just before the financial world exploded, I changed my mortgage provider.
To my considerable surprise, the original lender has just sent me the deeds to the property. They make fascinating reading and I'm pleased to have them, but shouldn't they have gone to the new lender?
Many thanks for any thoughts.
JHW
To my considerable surprise, the original lender has just sent me the deeds to the property. They make fascinating reading and I'm pleased to have them, but shouldn't they have gone to the new lender?
Many thanks for any thoughts.
JHW
0
Comments
-
I re-mortgaged from HBOS to First Direct last month. About a week later I get a letter from HBOS asking where they should send the deeds. I called HBOS and asked them to send them to my home address. About 2 weeks later I get my deeds - but they've been sent to me by HSBC (FD are apart of HSBC), stating they don't require my deeds."You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"0
-
Thanks for that. My remortgage was from a small provincial building society to the Halifax. Maybe I should ring the Halifax and ask them if they'd like to look after the deeds for me.
Are the deeds the actual proof that I own the property? Are they incredibly valuable?
JHW0 -
I think as all transactions are electronic there is now no need for the lender to hold the deeds as before. They aren't valuable, but are a historic record so hang on to them.0
-
A decent synopsis of the situation:
http://www.askbm.co.uk/mortgages/deeds/demat.asp0 -
Thanks for the answers. That article is interesting: is "dematerialisation" really a legal term? Very Doctor Who...
JHW0 -
Basically, as stated above, they have no real value but worth hanging onto as
1 historic and sentimental value
2. it is just possible (but not likely) that there might be stuff to do with rights of way or suchlike which has been missed by the LR or refers to a different adjoining property
and
3. the word "deeds" sometimes covers things like planning permission or building regs which just might be needed (but again not likely) when the property is sold and it is expensive to get copies from the council
terryw
."If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools"
Extract from "If" by Rudyard Kipling0 -
My solicitor sent mine back in the 70's saying "I should keep them for some considerable time" He was also one of the building society's solicitors.0
-
I have never understood how people get them
I have had two house and 3 different mortgages and no once have I been asked or its even been mentioned if I would like a copy0 -
I got present house in Feb 06 and hopefully changed mortgage before then Jan 09
My 1st house in 1989 and re mortgage again in 2003/04 but never asked once about deeds0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards