Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Meet the Wilsons Part2 - Fergus goes mad on Radio 5

191012141518

Comments

  • fatpig_2
    fatpig_2 Posts: 631 Forumite
    Are they not dead yet?
  • sarkin
    sarkin Posts: 785 Forumite
    Generali pointed me in the direction of these guys the last time I debated the Wilsons

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunt_brothers
  • stevetodd
    stevetodd Posts: 1,016 Forumite
    Has anybody calculated their potential CGT bill?

    I thought they were in trouble, are you sure they are going to sell showing a profit? Does anyome know?
  • icon4.gifBuy to Let landlords face extra Margin Call payments
    With the news today that Abby National is invoking Margin Calls (extra payments when LTVs fall below a certain value) on some of there mortgages buy to let is at far greater risk. In October MoneyWeeks Editor-in-chief Merryn Somerset Webb who has long predicted the crash predicted the demise of buy to let through these Margin calls.
    somersetwebb_merryn.gif

    Quote:
    Could this be the ruin of the buy-to-letters?


    I appeared on BBC Breakfast last week with a buy to let investor who was convinced he was very rich. He had, he said, made £8m out of the buy to let boom. Further chat revealed that he had properties valued at £8m but £5.5m worth of debt. So he is on paper ‘worth’ £2.5m. You might think that sounds like a reasonable margin of error but I’m not sure its enough: property can turn nasty fast. Many of the reasons not to invest now (the main one being the fact that yields are lower than interest rates) have been widely discussed but here’s one more reason to steer clear. Buy to let mortgages deals tend to contain little read covenants regarding the loan-to-value ratio of the mortgage. In a rising market this isn’t the kind of thing borrowers take notice of but in a falling market they may find that it is the ruin of them.

    It works like this. The loans allow lenders to periodically revalue properties (at the borrowers expense naturally). If the value has fallen and the loan to value ratio has, as a result, risen above the level required by the mortgage (say from 80% to 85%) the lender can then ask the borrower to come up with more cash to get it back down. The result, says my lawyer friend, will be that as capital values drop, buy-to-let investors will start to receive letters from the lenders along the lines of 'Dear Mr Bloggs, I should be grateful if you would restore your loan to value ratio by sending us a cheque for £25,000'.

    This, most mortgaged-up-to-hilt investors will be utterly unable to do. The result? Panic selling and not just from the market’s new entrants. People who have been in the market for more than a few years are keen to suggest that they will be immune from any drop in prices thanks to the equity they have built up. But most of them – the man I met on the BBC sofa included - have also bought new properties in the last year. If margin calls – for this is what they are - start coming in on these how are they going to come up with the cash? No one’s immune.

    http://www.moneyweek.com/investments...o-letters.aspx
    :eek:


    Any up to date info on the Wilsons and the situation now?
  • It looks like SquatNow was right.
    RENTING? Have you checked to see that your landlord has permission from their mortgage lender to rent the property? If not, you could be thrown out with very little notice.
    Read the sticky on the House Buying, Renting & Selling board.


  • macaque_2
    macaque_2 Posts: 2,439 Forumite
    Kenny4315 wrote: »
    BTL isn't really dead those with any sense have it on hold, with cash in bank waiting, and next year will be taking full advantage of the market turbulence, when the BTL market becomes somewhat less competitive.

    Traditional BTL landlords look for rents of 12%+. Currently the return is under 4% but rising. If you are saying the traditional landlords will be back in the buying business next year you are suggesting that this correction will take place over the next 12 months.

    Whilst I am pleased to welcome you to the 70% club, I don't think it will happen as quickly as you are implying.
  • dopester
    dopester Posts: 4,890 Forumite
    Kenny4315 wrote: »
    :beer: Suppose I could rent them a flat but I'd charge them triple the going rate !!! :beer:

    BTL isn't really dead those with any sense have it on hold, with cash in bank waiting, and next year will be taking full advantage of the market turbulence, when the BTL market becomes somewhat less competitive.

    Pretty amusing. Economies all over the world are buckling the strain of the most powerful forces.

    It is quite possible it could lead to much darker, even a new reign of terror in many countries... and yet BTL scummers who expect BTL to be their ticket to wealth in the next year or so.

    For all that I know history and abhor such actions, BTLers might be lucky not to be rounded up and put in a detention camps if economic forces bring about delusional politics with recriminations. All for the love of HPI.

    Actually though, history often shows the worst excesses of recriminations comes not in the decent in to economic depression, nor during the time/years at the bottom, but as economies show some slight improvement and get a little stronger. Like with the French Revolution. Off with their heads.
    Greece has been in turmoil for 11 days. The mood seems to have turned "pre-insurrectionary" in parts of Athens - to borrow from the Marxist handbook. This is a foretaste of what the world may face as the "crisis of capitalism" - another Marxist phase making a comeback - starts to turn two hundred million lives upside down.

    We are advancing to the political stage of this global train wreck. Regimes are being tested. Those relying on perma-boom to mask a lack of democratic or ancestral legitimacy may try to gain time by the usual methods: trade barriers, sabre-rattling, and barbed wire.

    Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the head of the International Monetary Fund, is worried enough to ditch a half-century of IMF orthodoxy, calling for a fiscal boost worth 2pc of world GDP to "prevent global depression".

    "If we are not able to do that, then social unrest may happen in many countries, including advanced economies. We are facing an unprecedented decline in output. All around the planet, the people have reacted with feelings going from surprise to anger, and from anger to fear," he said.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/3870089/Protectionist-dominoes-are-beginning-to-tumble-across-the-world.html
  • dopester
    dopester Posts: 4,890 Forumite
    Last night I re-familiarised myself with The European Convention on Human Rights/

    Greece has been in turmoil for 11 days. The mood seems to have turned "pre-insurrectionary" in parts of Athens - to borrow from the Marxist handbook. This is a foretaste of what the world may face as the "crisis of capitalism" - another Marxist phase making a comeback - starts to turn two hundred million lives upside down.
    SECTION I
    ARTICLE 2

    1. Everyone's right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which this penalty is provided by law.

    2. Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:
    * (a) in defence of any person from unlawful violence;
    * (b) in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent escape of a person lawfully detained;
    * (c) in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.
  • dopester wrote: »
    Pretty amusing. Economies all over the world are buckling the strain of the most powerful forces.

    It is quite possible it could lead to much darker, even a new reign of terror in many countries... and yet BTL scummers who expect BTL to be their ticket to wealth in the next year or so.

    For all that I know history and abhor such actions, BTLers might be lucky not to be rounded up and put in a detention camps if economic forces bring about delusional politics with recriminations. All for the love of HPI.

    Oh dear!! :rotfl:
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • Any updates on the Wilsons?

    Have they got to make margin calls on the depreciation of their 900 houses?

    Have they started trying to sell any yet?

    I think we should all club together and put in offers of less than 50% asking price.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.