We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Martin told you Icesave had a "dodgy compensation scheme"... his comment on 4 News

Martin Lewis has just been on Ch 4 News and in answer to Jon Snow said although Icesave was in his Best Buy tables he constantly warned that it had "a dodgy compensation scheme" if it went bust.

I was wondering just how many people were aware of his warnings as I can't remember any support or comment from him in threads when members of this board were warning against the risks back in April. Did everyone else read the warnings he says he gave and do they think they were given sufficient prominence in the way that many newspapers were highlighting the risks?

____________________________________

Insert By Martin... I've posted this later but thought it would be useful up front.


Apologies for the word 'dodgy' (or 'slightly dodgy' as someone has told me I actually said) to be honest that was hyperbole in the heat of the moment and wasn't the right word... importantly different would've been better.

It wasn't an easy interview. I seemed to be solely responsible for a recommendation that every website, best buy table, Which, Tv programme, newspaper article covering the guide had done.

I didnt know there would be a saver there when a walked in - and the chap in the wheelchair certainly added a different tone to the interview. And there could be no debate due to timings, and his speech difficulties.

Unfortunately it wasn't pointed out that the chap had never heard of me and wasn't a user of this site or watcher of any of my programmes.

I knew it was adversarial rather than "expert" interview, a change from when I was originally asked. This is something I'm not particularly used to and I normally would have been more careful about phrasing.

As for dodgy I still believe people's money is protected up to £50,000 and have been pushing the treasury hard on this today.

Let me clear up a few points in the thread.

1. Before I wrote the safe savings guide a year ago, little was known about the issue and we pieced a lot together. Two years ago no one cared a jot about this


2. In the original incarnation we didnt mention the passport scheme as we didnt know about it - simple as that.

3. It was included in the safe savings guide sometimes between January and April - I cant remember the exact date.

4. Since April (roughly from memory) EVERY mention of Icesave on the site included the following note directly underneath

IMPORTANT. Icesave, unlike some foreign banks, hasn’t chosen to be completely protected under the UK's Financial Services Compensation Scheme, and thus if, in the unlikely event that it were to go bust, getting the money back could be more difficult. See the Are Your Savings Safe? guide for a full explanation, and Martin’s Icesave safety blog.

5. The information about the passport scheme has been in the safe savings guide, which has been read many millions of times and put high up the weekly email so many times we've had complaints that it is boring.

I've been going on and on about this issue and the passport scheme on all my programmes, radio 2, gmtv (when time allows and im not cut off), It pays to watch and more. So much so i've been told by producers "everyone knows" lets do something else, when i've been pushing it as a subject.

6. As for commercial links to Icesave. Icesave was very rarely an affiliate link, for less than a month (from memory - but of that magnitude I believe)- in fact the site has hardly made any money from it. The times it was an affiliate link it was a long way down the list. I only wish in this one case we DIDNT have the ethcial stance that means we always say the best regardless of the site's revenue. As if so, Icesave would have almost never been on the site. Sadly we try and tell people what's the best rate.

I hope this clears things up - again apologies for the word dodgy - its not easy in the heat of the moment when you're feeling attacked.

I would also appreciate that whether you agree with me or not - you help direct people to some of these answers and my blog - so people can read what i have to say at first hand

Martin

PS and all updates on Icesave are in the safe savings guide, and as requested of course we will do template guides if necessary, if compensation needs applying for.

______________________________

UPDATE 9 October.

Hi

This thread is now closed so we can get back to the business of discussing savings...

Please see here

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=1210797

for info on why

Thank you

Martin
«13456717

Comments

  • Aegis
    Aegis Posts: 5,695 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I knew exactly what I was getting in to from what I read here.
    I am a Chartered Financial Planner
    Anything I say on the forum is for discussion purposes only and should not be construed as personal financial advice. It is vitally important to do your own research before acting on information gathered from any users on this forum.
  • The warnings were certainly there when I looked - and they were equally there on the Icesave web pages before I registered....
  • kingmonkey
    kingmonkey Posts: 846 Forumite
    I think 1,534,654 people were aware of his warnings. All the others were sheep.
  • IT_nerd
    IT_nerd Posts: 442 Forumite
    The warning were there when I decided to open an account.
    I just didn't realise just how !!!!!! the passport system was.
    Savings
    £14,200 with £1100 M.I.A. presumed dead.
  • Nick_C
    Nick_C Posts: 7,625 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Home Insurance Hacker!
    The impression I gained from this site was that Martin was telling people the passported compensation scheme was as good as the FSA scheme.

    We now know that may not be the case.
  • Helix
    Helix Posts: 2,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Nick_C wrote: »
    The impression I gained from this site was that Martin was telling people the passported compensation scheme was as good as the FSA scheme.

    We now know that may not be the case.

    That's the impression I gained as well. Not that it was dodgy, just different from other banks.
  • I was aware of the risks.
  • Helix wrote: »
    That's the impression I gained as well. Not that it was dodgy, just different from other banks.


    That is the impression I gained aswell, if I'd have thought the protection was "dodgy" I would have taken my money out months ago.
  • Why do people try and blame Martin, you make your own mind up on your investments and has been telling people to spread their savings to 35k in each bank.

    Every newspaper carries tables showing best rates - Martin has done alot of good advising people about money saving for free.
  • 1echidna
    1echidna Posts: 23,086 Forumite
    My recollection was that were postings calling some doubt on the scheme which I largely discounted as somewhat xenophobic. I could see though that there might be delays, not expecting there to be a real possibility of default for the first 20,000 Euros
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.