PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Bought new build, finished in summer 09, can we renegotiate as prices slide further ?

1235

Comments

  • Consider the worst case scenario, assuming that you've currently got a good deal (I can't comment there as I've not seen the property).

    Assume that between now and summer 2009 house prices continue to fall as generally predicted, losing 20%. You're now in the unfortunate position of buying a £236,000 house for £295,000.

    Losing the £59,000 is already bad.
    You may find it's even worse, because no lender will let you borrow more than 90% of the new value (£212,400) so you need to find £82,600. If you can't find that, you've already signed a contract to buy the house so the developers will sue you and you will go bankrupt.

    Personally, I'd get out for now, wait until they're pretty much finished and reopen negotiations at that point. You may find you can get the property much cheaper then anyway.
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    Why not pull out now and wait?

    Either (a) the devt will go ahead, and you can buy later down the line, when prices have fallen and the house is already there so you can see what you are buying. It's not as though prices are exactly likely to rise in the meantime, is it?!

    or (b) the devt will not go ahead, the developers may go bankrupt, prices will almost certainly fall further, etc.

    Either way, you will be much better off pulling out now and buying at a later date. It's not as though you can move in now, anyway, so in the kind of market we're in now, I simply cannot see any logical reason for committing yourself to this house now.

    You mentioned that the cheapest equivalent non new-build house was a fair bit more - but not that much more. Why not offer them the same as you've agreed to pay for this as yet to be built house, and see what they say? They may well jump at a potential buyer with no house to sell and an agreed mortgage. Worth a try.

    Or sit back and wait another year - you weren't going to be moving in for another year anyway. Then you'll be in a better position to take advantage of continuing falls.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,753 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Consider, and run past your solicitor, the risks of exchanging with no stop date and finding your mortgage offer has expired and you can't secure another one.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • Amino
    Amino Posts: 35 Forumite
    I guess the issue for us is that (if we pull out and wait) is that their is only one more property of this type available for sale on both phases of the site (Phase 2 has just started to be developed), which is a worse position on the plot with a smaller garden and only a single garage which is not attached to the house.

    Also at the ripe old age of 24 we never thought we could get a house like this for at least another ten years so there is some degree of grab it while you can whilst at the same time trying to weigh it all up and keep as level headed as possible which is proving somewhat difficult.

    If we are in contract at an agreed price and the property is downvalued by the lender, they would not lend the money, that said if I showed to the deveoper then would they not be inclined to accept the downvaluation of the proprerty than lose the sale comepletley ?

    I dont think even in this economic madness that we would/should get refused a mortgage as we have £121,000 as the deposit for this house, at £295,00 sale this is a LTV of ~59% !? if i've done the maths correctly..is this a wild assumption or am I fair to say this ? As this one is going in my name I would considered as a FTB, decent job, no credit cards, only one current account operating an overdraft of £5k..I know every case is individual but on paper it does not sound like a high risk loan to lender surely ?!?

    If the development drags on past the date they gave then this would not be ideal but I think when it boils down to it we will be based from my other half parents house so there are going to be minimal overheads running up to that time, obviously if I were renting then I would wholeheartedly agree with most comments that hav already been made re finishing dates


    And finally im not sure wether I should actually factor in the fact that they are paying the stamp duty from their own pocket so that £295,000 in reality from our perspective is £286,150 ?? :confused:
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    If we are in contract at an agreed price and the property is downvalued by the lender, they would not lend the money, that said if I showed to the deveoper then would they not be inclined to accept the downvaluation of the proprerty than lose the sale comepletley ?


    They don't lose the sale completely, do they. They get to keep your 10% deposit and sell the property to someone else. They also get to chase you for any loss they suffer over and above the 10%. As you have £121,000 available, they will be able to get their money out of you. So, they can sell the property for say £195,000 to someone else. They have your £30k deposit, which they keep, and they collect the other £70k from you personally. There's absolutely no incentive for them to reduce the price they sell to you at.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Oh, and you have to take any incentives such as stamp duty payments into account in calculating LTV. Also, if the price comes below £250k, and it's not that far off, the stamp duty goes down to 1% anyway.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • Amino
    Amino Posts: 35 Forumite
    would they not have to work something out though if the lender simply said the property was worth less than they are asking for it and they would not lend to us on that basis ? Prob a stupid question but hey...:confused:
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Amino wrote: »
    would they not have to work something out though if the lender simply said the property was worth less than they are asking for it and they would not lend to us on that basis ? Prob a stupid question but hey...:confused:

    Yes, it's a stupid question, I'm afraid. :)
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • Amino
    Amino Posts: 35 Forumite
    fair enough ;) its my first/ our second house purchase so need to cover all bases
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,365 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Amino wrote: »
    fair enough ;) its my first/ our second house purchase so need to cover all bases

    Basically, buying off-plan violates one of the basic rules of house purchase. That rule says you should have your finance in place before signing the contract. However, because the contract is so open-ended, it's impossible to have a finance offer that lasts long enough.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.