child benefit indirectly included in soa

blind-as-a-bat_2

Rylynn wrote: »

What she said WHAT, come on where is this person coming from, there are definates on CB ie cannot be included. Now if that is gonna change in the future, that is NOT NOW. so you cannot be taken as any guinea pig to see if you bite or not.

Makes me like BAAB as mad as hell.:mad:

Has she got any kids, does she know what they COST to run as sure as hell more than a car.

I am incensed already to read a child is anything from 0 to 16.. ha ha.. does a 5 year old eat what my 14 year old does, does the 5 year old have VAT added to clothes is he/she 5 foot 7 with the appetite of an APE.. no.. but they are treated the same on an SOA.. what a joke.

They already took away the Child tax element, Gordon Brown please tell ME why it is paid to keep kids not anything else, if they go the same route with CB what is the point of paying it out to parents.

Whoever your ORs assistant is she needs a shot up her royal backside!:mad:

Well put, well i could put it better but the swear filter wont let me:p :rotfl:

I would love to have a chat with this examinor cardinalfire:rolleyes:

marshmallow13

Hiya - just a quickie - I put my CB on my SOA i didn't know not to include it and no one told me otherwise - they happily put it through with that. !!!!!!s!

blind-as-a-bat_2

marshmallow13you are supposed to list it on your SAO, but the OR is supposed to totally disregard the amount when calculating if you should pay an IPA.

so you need to check the figures used for any IPA for income is less any CB you declared