We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Isa lifetime?
Comments
-
deemy2004 wrote:And since the stock market perked up many are also using their Mini ISa allowances up as well
Presumably you mean Mini Stocks & Shares ISAs ?even though the benefits there are less evident, given the quarterly charges by most brokers
What quarterly charges ? I've never paid 'em to any broker - and suggest anyone who does moves elsewhere.0 -
carnet wrote:Presumably you mean Mini Stocks & Shares ISAs ?
What quarterly charges ? I've never paid 'em to any broker - and suggest anyone who does moves elsewhere.
Quarterly charges on self select ISA's range from about £6.25 to about £25 per quarter. Is there one that does not charge ?
offcourse the fund ISA's carry their own charges i.e. 5% for buying in or more, plus the annual management fees of 1 to 3% So on £3k equates to about 210 for the first year.0 -
deemy2004 wrote:Cash ISa's are completely different - they don't carry anywhere near the risk ! not comparable...
How are they not comparable? Both take lump sums, both provide a return which is subject to a profit margin. One you can see the profit margin, one you cannot. Risk is not an issue when it comes to charges.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
dunstonh wrote:How are they not comparable? Both take lump sums, both provide a return which is subject to a profit margin. One you can see the profit margin, one you cannot. Risk is not an issue when it comes to charges.
Cash ISA's start earning interest from day 1
Fund ISA's are immediatly looking at a loss of about 5% or more
Cash ISA's accrue interest on a daily basis,without missing a single days.
Fund ISA's value goes up or down, depending on whether the fund goes up or down.
Cash ISA - You know with near certainty that you will make a gain.
Fund ISA's - The risk is that you will make a loss.
There is no comparison between, them they are completely different animals !0 -
Risk is not an issue when it comes to charges.
It's a funny thing about risk.
If there's a low risk of losing your money (eg with cash) you pay nil or very low charges.
If there's a high risk of loss(eg with stockmarket funds) you pay high charges.
You'd think it would be the other way round, wouldn't you?
Trying to keep it simple...
0 -
Correct, they are different types of investments. However, they still both have a profit margin.
Cash ISA returns are dependent on how much money the bank makes in other areas and how much profit they want to cream off it. If they have a good year, they can have a massive profit. If they have a bad year, they may run at a loss. OMG, it sounds like a with profits fund
. Unit Trust/Oeic Funds have a defined charge that they can take from the profit regardless of how they perform.
Funds use charges to cover costs and make a profit.
Are you saying that Cash ISAs do not cover charges and make a profit?If there's a low risk of losing your money (eg with cash) you pay nil or very low charges.
Where are you paying the charges though? You are correct that lower risk investment funds tend to have lower charges. Although less work usually goes into them.
If you see a financial advisor and its done on commission, do you pay nil? No, the charges within the products arranged cover the commission. If you paid a fixed defined fee, then the charges in the plan would be lower. That is how Cash ISAs and Savings accounts work. They are not doing it for love. The savings accounts are being creamed at an unknown rate before they pay you the savings rate. I wonder what the rates would be like if you got 1% AMC on a savings account?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
deemy2004 wrote:Fund ISA's are immediatly looking at a loss of about 5% or more
Go through a discount broker (as, hopefully, all fund investors, not requiring advice, who read these boards will) and the IC is more like 0.5% and, on many funds, sometimes less or even nil.0 -
The one's we invest in don't make a profit from us, dhdunstonh wrote:Are you saying that Cash ISAs do not cover charges and make a profit?
. 0 -
Well whether or not Northern Rock makes a profit my 6% TESSA is fixed for 4 years. (3 left).
So yes in which case they will have to PAY interest whether they make a profit or a loss !0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards