We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Dixons refuse refund/replacement

124»

Comments

  • uktim29
    uktim29 Posts: 2,722 Forumite
    PopeSock wrote: »
    I used to work in the tech support department of a retail computer company - not part of the Dixons/Currys/PC World etc group. It wasn't a nice place to work and I lasted about three months there. But sometimes when customer services was apparently backed up, they took some of us off the desk and had us answering complaints. And by answering, I mean briefly reading the letter and pasting in one of three or so form responses. Quite a lot of which were addressed to the head of the company. They just got headed off at the pass before they ever reached him.

    Exactly. I've got no idea why people think they'll get it, they won't.
  • Honeydog
    Honeydog Posts: 877 Forumite
    I've got no idea why people buy really expensive stuff from Dixons/ Currys etc

    Choose a decent company with a proper refund policy.
    Don't grow up. Its a trap!

    Peace, love and labradors!
  • fruity1 wrote: »
    uktim29 wrote: »

    CEO's & MD's don't deal with complaints, full stop, they have staff that deal with those of us that write to them in person. The CEO/MD usually has no knowledge of the complaint either. You are writing to a department, not the person, but it is effective.

    That's not entirely accurate, in my experience. I think it depends on the nature of the business and the quality of service they aspire to. I work in the insurance industry, and if a complaint is raised to our CEO, they always take notice of it - of course they ask someone else to respond but nevertheless, they make sure it is resolved.
  • Is it a two man shop or a really big insurance company? Would of thought a large insurance companies CEO would of got one their mortgaged up monkeys to read and respond.
  • VfM4meplse
    VfM4meplse Posts: 34,269 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker I've been Money Tipped!
    uktim29 wrote: »
    I think you've forgotten the volume of people large companies deal with. How a MD/CEO would be able to deal with every single complaint addressed to them and do their actual jobs is a mystery.

    I agree but if there are constant complaints about a particular element of the service offered then the direction to restructure that service will come from on high.
    Value-for-money-for-me-puhleeze!

    "No man is worth, crawling on the earth"- adapted from Bob Crewe and Bob Gaudio

    Hope is not a strategy :D...A child is for life, not just 18 years....Don't get me started on the NHS, because you won't win...I love chaz-ing!
  • Mekon wrote: »
    The Sales of Goods Act. (assuming you bought the tv over the counter and not online)
    You really should read up on this, it's quite useful. Dixons sales staff seem to always fob people off.

    If the set you have bought is not fit for purpose then you should be entitled to a replacement, repair or refund.It is up to the retailer what course of action is taken (Unless you agree to have the set repaired).
    The Onus is on the retailer (for the first 6 months) that the fault was not an inherent fault. correct

    If you want you can get an independant engineers report to prove the TV has an inherent fault, but inform Dixons first that you intend to do this (in writing) and that you will also claim the engineers fee from Dixons, if proved the fault to be inherent. wouldn't bother it is down to Dixons to prove it has not got abn inherent fault has previously mentioned

    But really it is up to Dixons to prove the fault was not there in the first place, it has nothing to do with the Manufacturer, under the SoGA a consumers contract is with the Retailer!correct

    Do not become fobbed off with Dixons approach. Ask them to prove the fault wan't there all the time (like you said a NEW £2000 tv should not have this problem so soon), the 28 day rule used by many retilers is not worth the verbal diatribe.

    IF the fault on the TV is by any slim chance your fault,this would be classed as accidental damage which isn't covered by the SOGA so you would not be entitled to a repair then they will only offer to repair the tv, but as I say they willhave to report this.

    Write to Dixons, informing them that you are refusing the TV under the SofGA, and that you would prefer a NEW TV or a refund. it is a bit late for the op to reject the tv, he has had too long and he should have rejected it originally when he thought it had previously been used. He is entitled to a repair or replacement but this is dependant on Dixons


    After 6 months the onus come down to the consumer, but as you have already made Dixons aware of your displeasure, that shouldn't be too much of a problem, but do keep a record of all correspondence (in writing and phone calls, keep copie of times and dates).

    Download a copy of the SoGA and take this into Dixons, next time you visit, it works wonders, especially when it gets to the Manager!
    You have rights, use them! I believe Dixons is just online now so it would be more fruitful for the op either to ring customer services and then write to them. Consumer direct have excellent template letters on their website

    Confuscious say: Never lose your cool, no matter how frustrated you are!
    Hope this helps.

    I have just amended this for the op, please look at the link from the cab website that emphasises your rights.
  • Mekon
    Mekon Posts: 11 Forumite
    I have just amended this for the op, please look at the link from the cab website that emphasises your rights.


    'Write to Dixons, informing them that you are refusing the TV under the SofGA, and that you would prefer a NEW TV or a refund. it is a bit late for the op to reject the tv, he has had too long and he should have rejected it originally when he thought it had previously been used. He is entitled to a repair or replacement but this is dependant on Dixons'

    Well according to this post, it wouldn't be too late, if you're willing to take it to court! As long as it's a 40,000 mile tv! ;)
    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.html?p=13979615&postcount=15
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.