We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Your Opinion: Kick Starting The Mortgage Market With Tax Payer's Money
Paul_N_4
Posts: 344 Forumite
As the government seem to be doing their 'controlled leak' of various ideas to gauge public opinion, thought we may as well have an outright poll on the most controversial of measures that's been publicised so far.
So would you, or would you not, be happy for the government to use public taxes to back mortgage securities in order to increase the number of new mortgage approvals going forward?
So would you, or would you not, be happy for the government to use public taxes to back mortgage securities in order to increase the number of new mortgage approvals going forward?
How do you feel about the government using taxes to increase mortgage approvals? 74 votes
0
Comments
-
definitely yes. I have no problem in my taxes being spent this way0
-
Fine by me. I think house prices need to be kept as high as possible in these timesAs the government seem to be doing their 'controlled leak' of various ideas to gauge public opinion, thought we may as well have an outright poll on the most controversial of measures that's been publicised so far.
So would you, or would you not, be happy for the government to use public taxes to back mortgage securities in order to increase the number of new mortgage approvals going forward?
I'm getting the feeling a high percentage of the members on here are thinking house prices will drop 35%, the economy will survive, they will eventually be able to buy a house and we will all crack on. If this happens trust me this is not what will happen.0 -
No way. Why should our taxes be spent on propping up the housing marketmr.broderick wrote: »I'm getting the feeling a high percentage of the members on here are thinking house prices will drop 35%, the economy will survive, they will eventually be able to buy a house and we will all crack on. If this happens trust me this is not what will happen.
So what percentage value of house price falls can the economy survive before Thunderdome is the main spectator sport then? :rolleyes:
Falls back to 2005 levels? How about falls back to 2004 levels?--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
Fine by me. I think house prices need to be kept as high as possible in these timesSo what percentage value of house price falls can the economy survive before Thunderdome is the main spectator sport then? :rolleyes:
Falls back to 2005 levels? How about falls back to 2004 levels?
Nice to see i'm off ignore !!!!!! ...;)0 -
Fine by me. I think house prices need to be kept as high as possible in these timeswhile people die in hospitals due to underfunding
and criminals are being released early to make way for others etc etc etc
The stupidity and greed of people in this country is sick and disgusting
You should have been here last night it was all going off big time.,0 -
No way. Why should our taxes be spent on propping up the housing marketWhat's all the latest on this anyway? are we going to march on them? (i so how far, I might need someone to push a wheelchair for me,) can we have MSE house price forum flags and banners? I bet there is already one of those internet petitions about this...
seriously, I'm fuming about it. Really, its punishing those who have been prudent and living with in their means and saving and aspiring towards sensible home ownership or accepting that home ownership might not be best for them.
It saddens me that in a country that should be proud of so much we have politicians who'd rather save a struggling housing market to the detriment of at least a generation, but can't find the money for by far improved drugs for cancer and Parkinsons and Alzheimers.0 -
No way. Why should our taxes be spent on propping up the housing marketmr.broderick wrote: »Nice to see i'm off ignore !!!!!! ...;)
Your memory must be going - I told you weeks ago.--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
-
No way. Why should our taxes be spent on propping up the housing marketOh yes, let's carry on spending 3 times the defence budget on propping up "the boom" - must be able to keep it going an extra day or two by not buying the proper kit for our forces. How much are flak jackets and nimrods these days..?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
