We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Your Opinion: Kick Starting The Mortgage Market With Tax Payer's Money

124»

Comments

  • Sir_Humphrey
    Sir_Humphrey Posts: 1,978 Forumite
    No way. Why should our taxes be spent on propping up the housing market
    Generali wrote: »
    Over the years, the British Government (and many others too) have wasted billions at least on trying to buck markets. From fixed exchange rates (failed every time) to incomes policies (failed). When will they learn not to pour good money after bad? Trying to get the voters to pay a load more in taxes for the privilege of paying more for housing is a new low possibly matched only by the Common Agricultural Policy.

    Well, the British government did try that in the early 1980s, the result of which is that we have a large trade deficit, hardly any industry, and whole families thrown on the economic scrapheap.

    I think there is some double-think going on here. We agree that markets are often poor resource allocators (for reasons we discussed of uncertainty, animal spirits etc), yet you argue that the whole economy should be run by their caprice. You slate economists, but blindly follow the policy formulae of free-market economists.

    You can't have it both ways guys.
    Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No way. Why should our taxes be spent on propping up the housing market
    Well, the British government did try that in the early 1980s, the result of which is that we have a large trade deficit, hardly any industry, and whole families thrown on the economic scrapheap.

    I think there is some double-think going on here. We agree that markets are often poor resource allocators (for reasons we discussed of uncertainty, animal spirits etc), yet you argue that the whole economy should be run by their caprice. You slate economists, but blindly follow the policy formulae of free-market economists.

    You can't have it both ways guys.

    My feeling is as Churchill said that democracy (and so Capitalism by extension which IMO is the only economic system compatible with democracy) is the worst system of Government except all the others we've tried.
  • Guy_Montag
    Guy_Montag Posts: 2,291 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No way. Why should our taxes be spent on propping up the housing market
    Generali wrote: »
    My feeling is as Churchill said that democracy (and so Capitalism by extension which IMO is the only economic system compatible with democracy) is the worst system of Government except all the others we've tried.
    We've not tried putting me in charge.. Yet!:cool:
    "Mrs. Pench, you've won the car contest, would you like a triumph spitfire or 3000 in cash?" He smiled.
    Mrs. Pench took the money. "What will you do with it all? Not that it's any of my business," he giggled.
    "I think I'll become an alcoholic," said Betty.
  • Sir_Humphrey
    Sir_Humphrey Posts: 1,978 Forumite
    No way. Why should our taxes be spent on propping up the housing market
    Generali wrote: »
    My feeling is as Churchill said that democracy (and so Capitalism by extension which IMO is the only economic system compatible with democracy) is the worst system of Government except all the others we've tried.

    We are only arguing about the type of Capitalism. Laissez-faire Capitalism is only one form of Capitalism, and is one that tends to work better in less democratic countries (one where the state can steamroller opposition to it's unpopular part - just a Thatcher did in the 1980s). Pinochet's Chile is a more extreme example.

    On the other hand, a system with proper strategic planning (of which the market is incapable) can provide better long term growth, a better society and better democracy (such as the Norway or Sweden post WW2). These are probably the most successful societies in the modern world.
    Politics is not the art of the possible. It consists of choosing between the disastrous and the unpalatable. J. K. Galbraith
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.