We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
PC package from Woolworths
Comments
-
Mr Skint - I guess that you bought a more expensive Lexmark. The real bargain basement ones come with just a colour cartridge. In the case of the Z735 ( 29.99 from Argos ) it mixes three colours to make black and as far as I can tell can't take a black cartridge at all - really crummy for that CV ......
The Z517 ( 34.99 from Argos ) comes with just a colour cartridge and if you want a black its another £14.99.
Maybe they have stopped the ' test purposes only ' approach but I used to see it a lot.
However the lack of a black cartridge still means that you have to add nearly 50% to the purchase price to get an acceptable standard of printing.qui tacet consentire -
Who is silent gives consent.0 -
I bought the cheapo Z615 £39.99 from Argos and its a nice printer does the job no fuss and also I never do photo quality prints ever as thats always a false economy by the time you buy the Ink, Paper, and then fine tune settings etc, its much easier to get a shed load done at a good independent photography shop.. at the mo im paying 3pence for each print, on Top Quality Photo paper.
Lexmark's $49 price tag for its Z735 sounds tempting, but you should think twice about it--even if it comes bundled as a freebee with a new PC. This printer uses a single cartridge containing just three colored inks (the usual cyan, magenta and yellow); in an unfortunate throwback to the early days of inkjet printing, it omits a black ink. Lexmark claims to have formulated the color inks so that they combine to yield "process black." But in our tests the Z735 produced some of the worst-looking text documents we remember seeing.
In our test samples, text looked very light and fuzzy. The smallest characters had a distinctly blue tint. Line art samples were much the same: vertical lines came out blue, horizontal lines were a faint gray, and thin lines were inaccurately formed. Narrow horizontal bands striped both our line art sample and our color graphics document, which looked pale and fuzzy, too. All three test documents earned a score of Poor.
Print quality improved on glossy photo paper: our grayscale photo earned a score of Fair, despite having a gritty texture and a strong olive-green cast. The Z735's strong point was its color photo quality. Though a bit grainy, glossy photos showed plenty of detail and vivid colors. Flesh tones seemed a little too tanned, however.
If you own a digital camera, you'll need to transfer your images to a PC before printing them: The Z735 lacks a PictBridge port and media slots.
Unlike several other Lexmark printers we've reviewed (such as the P915 photo printer), the Z35 doesn't compensate for poor quality with swift performance. In our tests, text pages printed at a dismal 2.1 pages per minute, while graphics documents emerged at a more reasonable 1.6 ppm; but our 5-by-7-inch color photo took 2 minutes and 51 seconds to print on letter-size glossy paper, far longer than the quickest time of 44 seconds.
The Z735 comes in a white-and-gray plastic case, with a top-mounted, upright, 100-sheet paper tray that doesn't feel terribly sturdy (it does fold up, however, so the printer is fairly compact when not in use).
The two-button control panel makes operating the Z735 a cinch. The power switch glows pleasantly blue when the printer is on--a touch that smacks of decadence compared to the unit's print quality and performance.
Upshot: Slow speeds and unattractive prints make the Z735 a disappointment, though glossy photos are of acceptable quality.0 -
True. I used to work for them, and things would arrive all the time with "reduced from..." lables already on which we had never seen before.grahawk wrote:I would describe it as a reasonable deal. The save £500 claim though is ludicrous. At £999 it would have been perhaps the most overpriced PC ever.
If you read the smallprint somewhere I think there is one store in Essex or somewhere where they put stuff on at these ridiculous prices so that they can then use "reduced" stickers in all the other stores. A lot of major chains do this.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards