We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
buying house from our landlord
Comments
-
girleight@ has got me thinking. Would it be an option for you to buy your retirement property soon but rent it out until you need it? The tenants would then be paying off your mortgage and you'd continue to live cheaply where you are.0
-
if you are on certain benefits - you should contact WarmFront and see about getting your heating system upgraded for free - tenants can apply and it wont cost the LL a penny.0
-
Mmmmmm! How would the new tenants that move in get to know of it being rent controlled? Could the new owner not keep quiet and just advertise it as normal?
No - the rent control relates to the sitting tenants, not to the house, so the tenants stay there....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0 -
neverdespairgirl wrote: »No - the rent control relates to the sitting tenants, not to the house, so the tenants stay there.
I'm confused! So the tenants bought the house and sold it for 75% of the market value?GOOGLE it before you ask, you'll often save yourself a lot of time.
0 -
No. Some random company bought it, for 75% of what it would have been worth without the tenants, and inherited the tenants with the house....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
-
girleight@ wrote: »If you could afford £1600 a month then couldn't you save £1000 a month and use that as rent when you are older?
Exactly. You say "a mortgage will end", but only if you pay more than the interest. You're talking about a level of borrowing that would be £1000 a month in interest, so at £600 a month in rent you should be able to put whatever you would pay on the mortgage capital, PLUS £5000, into an ISA. Call it £6000 total.
Do that for ten years and you'll have £84,000. Far more than you would have paid off on your mortgage, and more than you'd have in equity unless house prices rocket (not looking very likely).Hurrah, now I have more thankings than postings, cheers everyone!0 -
Exactly. You say "a mortgage will end", but only if you pay more than the interest. You're talking about a level of borrowing that would be £1000 a month in interest, so at £600 a month in rent you should be able to put whatever you would pay on the mortgage capital, PLUS £5000, into an ISA. Call it £6000 total.
Do that for ten years and you'll have £84,000. Far more than you would have paid off on your mortgage, and more than you'd have in equity unless house prices rocket (not looking very likely).
I thought the whole point is that absyandtigger could buy the property at well below the vacant market value as they have a secure tenancy that makes the property worth less and *very* unattractive to other buyers. Then they can (presumably) surrender the secure tenancy to themselves once contracts are exchanged so the property is then worth more on the open market giving them instant large equity, flexibility what they do with the property and the ability to sell up at full vacant market value in the future.
The problems being how to establish price at which to offer or bid up to at auction and how to fund the purchase.0 -

I thought the whole point is that absyandtigger could buy the property at well below the vacant market value as they have a secure tenancy that makes the property worth less and *very* unattractive to other buyers. Then they can (presumably) surrender the secure tenancy to themselves once contracts are exchanged so the property is then worth more giving them instant large equity, flexibility what they do with the property and the ability to sell up at full vacant market value in the future.
The problems being how to establish price at which to offer/purchase and how to fund the purchase.
I thought the general consensus was that nobody here really believed the landlord's claim about what the open market value is, at least at face value and without further evidence!
If the landlord is correct as to the value, then of course everything changes - and I'd personally go with the option of offering to let them buy you out of the tenancy for around £100k cash. Everybody wins.Hurrah, now I have more thankings than postings, cheers everyone!0 -
I thought the general consensus was that nobody here really believed the landlord's claim about what the open market value is, at least at face value and without further evidence!
If the landlord is correct as to the value, then of course everything changes - and I'd personally go with the option of offering to let them buy you out of the tenancy for around £100k cash. Everybody wins.
So what if the landlord's figures are overblown? It's still obvious that having secure tenants of 40 years young and with the right to pass that on to a relative affects the market value of the property hugely. So the tenants can get their own survey to get the market value with them as secure tenants and use that as a basis to offer or bid at auction. Dissolving the tenancy will still produce a return to a much higher vacant market value. If the landlords figures are too high and he refuses to sell at a sensible price then the tenants can still have a crack at auction where hopefully there won't be much competition.0 -
absyandtigger, The is a lot of money at stake here so get some professional advice on the valuations, how to deal with the tenancy and how/if it could be done raise to the funds. I hope you let us know how you get on.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
