Credit Reference Agencies - Who Really Uses Who?! UPDATE

never-in-doubt

UNDERGROUND wrote: »

BUMP!

Come on noah271007! Thought you were gunna spruce up the CRA thread!!

Regards
UNDERGROUND

he's probably getting drunk mate :-)

myself and innocent have now SAR'd all 7 companies and will soon be able to tell what each of the dirty secrets they hold about us are!

You're aware what i'm on about aren't you mate? This post: #95

noah271007

UNDERGROUND wrote: »

BUMP!

Come on noah271007! Thought you were gunna spruce up the CRA thread!!

Regards
UNDERGROUND

Hello everyone!

Underground, I am working on the new thread and it should set up by tomorrow evening for the update !:j

Disappointing to see there are some nutters still causing trouble on the forums!! A waste of space really. Why don't they just p*ss off!!

Sutton111, i have sent u a PM.

sutton111

Noah I have sent you a PM.

never-in-doubt

noah271007 wrote: »

Hello everyone!

Disappointing to see there are some nutters still causing trouble on the forums!! A waste of space really. Why don't they just p*ss off!!

Noah - cos they have as much right to be here as you and I. And to be fair you have only read Proliants responses, not the whole thread and I think your comments are a little unfair mate.

I'm not nagging or having a go, far from it, but the latest trouble is caused by moral high-ground preachers that do not grasp the current laws set in place to protect us.

Anyway, just thought i'd set the record straight. I am in essence one of the 'nutters' you mention but why should I have to p**s off? Because I believe that a legal document should be just that, legal? If so then sorry - I can't argue. Guilty as charged

I offer loads of support and advice but also argue, thats a fair medium and no different to the mighty Proliant! Why that guy is untouchable amazes me cos he is a trouble maker.

never-in-doubt

noah271007 wrote: »

Hello everyone!

Underground, I am working on the new thread and it should set up by tomorrow evening for the update !:j
.

Mate forgot to say don't go too far with your little project cos the case with Lowell will have an impact on CRA's so to be honest no-one may be using them in the near future lol.

Out of interest, is it ok with you to allow us to add the details of what the companies we SAR'd hold about us on the new thread, kinda related? for example that hunters record XXX data and Experian DA record XXX data etc.... it will also help people learn who send them information and who are main cifas reporting culprits (we know it is sygma but who else?)

Get back to me please, its myself and Innocent - we;ve SAR'd all the agencies, I mean each and every one of the beggers including cifas/hunters/synactics/experian DA/experian/equifax/call credit (7 of them).

Or do you think we should create a thread linked within your new one?

noah271007

never-in-doubt wrote: »

Noah - cos they have as much right to be here as you and I. And to be fair you have only read Proliants responses, not the whole thread and I think your comments are a little unfair mate.

I'm not nagging or having a go, far from it, but the latest trouble is caused by moral high-ground preachers that do not grasp the current laws set in place to protect us.

Anyway, just thought i'd set the record straight. I am in essence one of the 'nutters' you mention but why should I have to p**s off? Because I believe that a legal document should be just that, legal? If so then sorry - I can't argue. Guilty as charged

I offer loads of support and advice but also argue, thats a fair medium and no different to the mighty Proliant! Why that guy is untouchable amazes me cos he is a trouble maker.

What make you think you are one of the nutters?? I am referring to those idiots who are in general being abusive and use foul language that are offensive to many of us.
I don't take sides mate.. I actually support your point, as long the laws allows it.

I am just tired of people causing problems, life's too short. I speak for many members here, so don't take it the wrong way.

Innocent_Guy

never-in-doubt wrote: »

Mate forgot to say don't go too far with your little project cos the case with Lowell will have an impact on CRA's so to be honest no-one may be using them in the near future lol.

Out of interest, is it ok with you to allow us to add the details of what the companies we SAR'd hold about us on the new thread, kinda related? for example that hunters record XXX data and Experian DA record XXX data etc.... it will also help people learn who send them information and who are main cifas reporting culprits (we know it is sygma but who else?)

Get back to me please, its myself and Innocent - we;ve SAR'd all the agencies, I mean each and every one of the beggers including cifas/hunters/synactics/experian DA/experian/equifax/call credit (7 of them).

Or do you think we should create a thread linked within your new one?

Hey NID,

I think we should open a new thread detailing all the info. I am quite happy adding mine obviously missing out the personal info. Its a shame that you can;t add pics on MSE....

noah271007

never-in-doubt wrote: »

Mate forgot to say don't go too far with your little project cos the case with Lowell will have an impact on CRA's so to be honest no-one may be using them in the near future lol.

Out of interest, is it ok with you to allow us to add the details of what the companies we SAR'd hold about us on the new thread, kinda related? for example that hunters record XXX data and Experian DA record XXX data etc.... it will also help people learn who send them information and who are main cifas reporting culprits (we know it is sygma but who else?)

Get back to me please, its myself and Innocent - we;ve SAR'd all the agencies, I mean each and every one of the beggers including cifas/hunters/synactics/experian DA/experian/equifax/call credit (7 of them).

Or do you think we should create a thread linked within your new one?

I think its best for you to create a thread linked with my new thread- u happy with that?
Certainly it is going to be interesting what the verdit will be - has the court battle started already?
What are you hoping to happen never-in-doubt?

never-in-doubt

Innocent_Guy wrote: »

Hey NID,

I think we should open a new thread detailing all the info. I am quite happy adding mine obviously missing out the personal info. Its a shame that you can;t add pics on MSE....

I'm thinking about you create the bit you were going to do and myself and innocent will work together compiling a list of what each of the 7 scum bags hold against us, in general terms, so we'd list each and every item they hold about us - just omiting our real details.

Then when a newbie looks at the thread they will know exactly what to expect and exactly what company does what and what each of them do with and how they use our information etc..... Also detailed analysis of the specifics that each one reports against.....

never-in-doubt

noah271007 wrote: »

I think its best for you to create a thread linked with my new thread- u happy with that?
Certainly it is going to be interesting what the verdit will be - has the court battle started already?
What are you hoping to happen never-in-doubt?

court battlle is tomorrow mate but it isnt a battle. lowells have made major !!!!-ups and to be honest its a question of how much £££'s they will lose, not if they lose!

Will keep you updated......

I agree we'll share the link. so when you update it with the main bit (post #1), create post 2 for us and just reserve it (type reserved for other news or something) then i'll send you the info to cut/paste into post #2 which keeps it all organised.....

Ok with you mate?