Do insulated radiator panels save money? - I'm testing them now
Options
Comments
-
beer2006 wrote:But it has bubble wrap on the back, how can you say it can't stop the convection heat being cooled by the wall?0
-
masonic wrote:In that case, you have more than just reflective panels. You have additional wall insulation, if you like. Some of the heat is being reflected (radiative). Some of it is warming the relective surface (convective), but the insulation (partially) prevents it being conducted to the wall itself. So, the question is whether the reflective part is really necessary? Bubblewrap itself might be almost as good.
Which is why we have foil covered bubble wrap effectively.“Pleasure of love lasts but a moment, pain of love lasts a lifetime.”0 -
beer2006 wrote:Which you would then say was absorbing the radiative heat :rolleyes:
My point was: if you are going to add insulation, then are these really just reflective panels, or are they acting mainly as bog standard insulation? Sure it's worth having a reflective surface - every little helps, but perhaps 'reflective panel' is then a misnomer, just as 'radiator' is a misnomer.
BTW, if it hasn't already become apparent, I was using the term 'reflective panel' in the above discussion to mean just that - tin foil - in my original response to djohn2002uk. Though I know you discussed the foil/bubblewrap combination before I joined this discussion, you didn't mention it again until just then. Our discussion has related to different things. :rotfl:0 -
I wonder how much the radiated heat would be stopped by the trapped air in the bubblewrap? Redundant thought anyway, as it has foil on it and it would be neglible compared to that presumeably.
I assume that all of these panels have a certain amount of insulation in them as well as a reflective layer. Thats what I was working on.
It certainly would seem so, text taken from the "My tech" link on previous page.
"Properly designed reflective panels, which combine reflective foil with a thin layer of insulation, can reduce the heat lost through walls by up to 18%."
As an afterthought I remember reading somewhere that std kitchen foil loses its shinyness after a while and stops being such a good reflector, I think the commercial panels have some non dulling surface on them.“Pleasure of love lasts but a moment, pain of love lasts a lifetime.”0 -
beer2006 wrote:I wonder how much the radiated heat would be stopped by the trapped air in the bubblewrap? Redundant thought anyway, as it has foil on it and it would be neglible compared to that presumeably.I assume that all of these panels have a certain amount of insulation in them as well as a reflective layer. Thats what I was working on.
It certainly would seem so, text taken from the "My tech" link on previous page.
"Properly designed reflective panels, which combine reflective foil with a thin layer of insulation, can reduce the heat lost through walls by up to 18%."As an afterthought I remember reading somewhere that std kitchen foil loses its shinyness after a while and stops being such a good reflector, I think the commercial panels have some non dulling surface on them.0 -
masonic wrote:You can always replace the foil, though, or cover it in cling film.
:rotfl:
Actually the clingfilm is a good idea, assuming it doesn't melt or get distorted by the heat, or fall off, maybe a clear thin glue, following on......... some sort of thin clear layer painted on the foil. Clear varnish?“Pleasure of love lasts but a moment, pain of love lasts a lifetime.”0 -
beer2006 wrote:Ahh but the plastic in the clingfilm would absorb the radiated heat
:rotfl:
Actually the clingfilm is a good idea, assuming it doesn't melt or get distorted by the heat, or fall off, maybe a clear thin glue, following on......... some sort of thin clear layer painted on the foil. Clear varnish?0 -
beer2006 wrote:text taken from the "My tech" link on previous page.
"Properly designed reflective panels, which combine reflective foil with a thin layer of insulation, can reduce the heat lost through walls by up to 18%."
As both I and Masonic have asked above, what does that 'up to 18%' relate to?
Firstly I have grave Suspicions when the phrase “up to” is used; as that covers from 0.001% upwards.
Secondly up to 18% of the wall area behind the radiator? It surely cannot possibly be 18% of the total loss through all walls?
Lastly given that total heat loss through all walls is normally 20-30% even in the unlikely(impossible) event that it saved up to 18% of the total loss through all walls, you are talking of 4-5% of total heating.
My guess is they will save less than 1% of total heating bills; around £5 a year for most.0 -
Cardew wrote:It surely cannot possibly be 18% of the total loss through all walls?
Edit: On thinking about this further, I'm starting to consider an 18% reduction on the total loss through all walls to be somewhat less far-fetched. I estimate about 5% of the area of my external walls are behind a radiator. If I were heating my house to 20 °C and it was 10 °C outside, in order to see an 18% reduction the area of wall behind the radiators would have to be losing heat 3.6 times faster than the rest of the wall area. That would equate to a wall temperature difference 3.6 times greater than 10 °C: namely 36 °C more than 10 °C (so a wall temperature of just under 50 °C behind the radiator). Now that does not seem unreasonable. This is all assuming a 100% efficient insulating panel, though.0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.9K Spending & Discounts
- 235.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.2K Life & Family
- 248.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards