IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including QR codes, number plates and reference numbers.
Mil Collections - Letter Before action
Options
Comments
-
I requested from the DVLA information on who had obtained my information around the alleged date. They sent me a letter and a copy of the v888/2 used, I don't have it in front of me but I'm pretty sure it was in the name of One Parking (or what ever they were trading as then). It was stated that it was for a PCN as well.0
-
one parking were in a ATA , so therefore must have used v888/3 (parking Cos) did you not question this? or have the DVLA made another &*(%$up?
please get sight of that letter
name of company
company number
reason for requestSave a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
Actually I didn't know to question it, as I didn't know there was even a v888/3 for them to use, now you have me questioning what form they sent me. Let me double check when I've got it in front of me.
Assume for the moment they used the correct form which as you say would be a v888/3 does the DPA still apply/limit the extent to which my data can be passed on?0 -
If the DVLA and ICO had any real balls, those PPCs would not just get their hands slapped - they'd get their hands cut off completely.pappa_golf wrote: »mil will pass the buck back to the PPC for breaking the kodoe and say they bought in good faith
in other cases the PPCs have simply said "sorry guv , wont do it again" to the DVLA , and had there hands slapped
in the case of UK parking (non ltd) the were not registered with the IPC at the date of the sale LTD (as a company) were , therefore the owner Steven Paul CHEETHAM is guilty of an ICO offence
But neither organisation has any real balls, they sold those to the highest bidder a while back.0 -
if they applied using v888/3 , specific to parking Cos , they got your details and passed them on , not sure if the offence is by using electronic or paper , however the paper version clearly states
I declare that the information given is correct to the best of
my knowledge. I will not use the information that I am given
for any other purpose than that stated in section 5. I am aware
that, under Section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998, it is an
offence to unlawfully procure or sell personal information.
I am aware that I am legally obliged to handle and dispose
of any information provided to me by DVLA in line with the
principles of the Data Protection Act 1998.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/558620/V888X3-Request-for-information-for-those-who-issue-parking-trespass-charge-notice.pdf
v888/2 states
I declare that the information given is correct to the best of
my knowledge. I will not use the information that I am given
for any other purpose than that stated in section 5. I am aware
that, under Section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998, it is an
offence to unlawfully procure or sell personal information.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/498401/V888X2_050116.pdf
Who is making the request Form
An individual Form V888
A company Form V8882
A company that issues parking or trespass charge notices Form V8883Save a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
So it was actually a v888/3 (that will teach me to post without having the document in front of me)
They certainly don't state they they intend to sell the driver details under the purpose.0 -
in fact in the little box directly above the sig
are the words
I declare that the information given is correct to the best of
my knowledge. I will not use the information that I am given
for any other purpose than that stated in section 5. I am aware
that, under Section 55 of the Data Protection Act 1998, it is an
offence to unlawfully procure or sell personal information.
you have a copy of the assignment notice ?Save a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
One of these (not great pictures, just what I had access to at the moment)
0 -
try again
the company that got your info is still active https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08267109
however neither one parking nor capital to coast are members of the IPC any moreSave a Rachael
buy a share in crapita0 -
pappa_golf wrote: »try again
the company that got your info is still active https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08267109
however neither one parking nor capital to coast are members of the IPC any more
Other then the MCOL this is everything I've had from Mil
Why does it make a difference that they are not a member of the IPC now? They were (just) when the information was given out by the DVLA.
I'm not sure I follow your point about the name?0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.8K Spending & Discounts
- 235.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.2K Life & Family
- 248.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards