📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

MSE News: Co-op 'breaking spirit' of anti rate-jacking credit card rules

Former_MSE_Guy
Former_MSE_Guy Posts: 1,650 Forumite
I've been Money Tipped! Newshound! Chutzpah Haggler
edited 11 February 2011 at 2:15PM in Credit cards
This is the discussion thread for the following MSE News Story:

"Credit card holders who legitimately reject an interest rate must repay costly debts in just six months ..."
Read the full story:
Co-op 'breaking spirit' of anti rate-jacking credit card rules


OfficialStamp.gif

A thread on this subject has already been set up which prompted the story.
«1345

Comments

  • Milarky
    Milarky Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    Rules agreed between the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, and the credit card industry last year, state consumers must then be given a "reasonable" time to clear existing debts. UK Payments, a trade body for card firms, says that loose definition means card providers can set payments at different levels.


    Co-op's six-month rule does not fall in line with industry standards.
    ''Reasonable'' for the purpose of repaying a debt should look to the individual's circumstances - i.e. this varies from person to person AND the amount of debt at the point of changeover. Basically "reasonable" is a "how-long-is-a-piece-of-string" con by the credit card buddies on the dim-witted government.
    "Where you use your account or do not repay any outstanding balance within six months you will be taken to have accepted the change in rate and the new rate will apply to you."
    This is tricky too I would suggest - a way to lull people into falling under the change when the purpose of the industry agreement was to try and prevent [the unwary] doing precisely that and getting into greater difficulty.

    Co-op should be ashamed. And if that doesn't work they should be boycotted [IMO]
    .....under construction.... COVID is a [discontinued] scam
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 35,242 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 11 February 2011 at 3:12PM
    I'm not surprised that a lender is trying this approach, but I AM surprised it's the Co-Op. You'd have thought it would be those dastardly Americans, not the cuddly old purveyors of Green Shield Stamps.
  • typical - this being the same co-op that will bounce a direct debit even if you deposit the cash for it the same day.

    apparantly cash deposits at there branches are not same day.....
  • typical - this being the same co-op that will bounce a direct debit even if you deposit the cash for it the same day.

    Most banks have T&C's in place that indicate that the money for a DD should be in the account the working day before the DD is due.

    Do the Co-op not have this in place, or do they explicitly say that you can fund the account the same day as the DD is due?
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • Milarky wrote: »
    ''Reasonable'' for the purpose of repaying a debt should look to the individual's circumstances - i.e. this varies from person to person AND the amount of debt at the point of changeover. Basically "reasonable" is a "how-long-is-a-piece-of-string" con by the credit card buddies on the dim-witted government.[IMO]

    I don't think it is unfair of the Co Op to define what is a "reasonable" time period for repaying credit card debt, which arguably should not normally be long term debt, although I personally would agree that an industry standard formula for defining reasonable (based on something like debt as a percentage of income) wouldn't have gone amiss when the rules were drawn up.

    Allowing customers to pay off at the rate of the minimum repayment every month for years is hardly "reasonable" to the bank (taking a look at a couple of the credit card summary boxes on the Co Op website, customers could theoretically reject the new interest rate and still be repaying the balance 17 YEARS later!). If they are in financial hardship other arrangements should be being looked into rather than this option.

    Six months is clearly too short a time frame though as a baseline, and the reality is that those customers in financial hardship (i.e. the ones that really suffer from ratejacking) are probably the least likely to formally request more time to pay. The Co Op should have a rethink on this one rather than wait for the Ombudsman and regulator to get involved.
  • iceage3
    iceage3 Posts: 235 Forumite
    Here here to the last post,this is poor by them after closing card you need more than six months to pay off .
  • chexum
    chexum Posts: 546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    edited 11 February 2011 at 6:38PM
    Allowing customers to pay off at the rate of the minimum repayment every month for years is hardly "reasonable" to the bank...

    Why wouldn't it be? They didn't consider it unreasonable to offer a credit limit at an APR with a minimum payment option. At the minimum levels they are raking in massive amount of extra interest charges (but for a very long term), which would bring in a massive amount of profit when their interest to borrow is lower (which it must be).

    At best, it's the least reasonable for the customer, but they are the ones to be protected - the payments will be even less reasonable for them with an increased APR.

    Just for a quick example of the timelines - from the minimum payment calculator on the site, paying the minimum of 2% (min £5) of £2,000 @20% APR:

    You'd pay off £2,000 in
    44 years and 10 months
    and cost £5,940 in interest
    Enjoy the silence...
  • Could this be a measure to recoup the money they have paid out in PPI claims.

    I had been a long standing Co-op bank customer for over 20 yrs and it took 2.5 yrs to get the PPI back they constantly stonewalled my claim good customer service I think not they are no different to any other bank
  • Cooperative seem to be redefining the word 'Ethical', and not in a good way. Just one of many technical system 'manipulations' they have been up to.

    Co-operative / Smile are phasing out Visa Electron Cards, new cards are being issued only as Visa Debit cards.

    Existing Valid Visa Electron Cards (with an Electron Logo) have been quietly reclassified by online systems to be now recognised as Visa Debit Cards instead. This happens when using an existing Visa Electron card and choosing 'Electron' as the card payment type when paying for the transaction.

    The transaction will state the card has not being recognised as a Visa Electron Card (even though it is) allowing you to continue the transaction, but then charge your Visa Electron card the fee associated with Visa Debit Cards.

    Using a Cooperative/Smile Visa Electron Card, this was tested against the flybe.com website - which, even though it showed flight details with card payment fees of 0.00 when Visa Electron was selected, submitting the card details came back with the card not being recognised as a Visa Electron and a subsequent fee of £18.00 was adding to the booking of the two flights. £4.50 fee per person/per flight each way.

    Phoning Cooperative, they denied changes has been made to the bin codes issued by the bank, and stated existing Electron cards starting 4508, should still be recognised as 'Visa Electron' and the fees associated with this, but stated that it had 'merged' all cards issued to Visa Debit. Co-operative has also issued no changes to terms and conditions confirming this change as regard to existing Electron cards being treated as Visa Debit type transaction.

    Flybe stated that 'Visa Debit' bin information is currently associated with Payment Cards relating to Cooperative/Smile, so that all Smile cards are now recognised only as Visa Debit. But stated there was nothing currently they could do.

    The current flybe.com website is therefore misleading as regard to the prices advertised, as it appears there is no way of obtaining flights at the minimum advertised price, by paying Visa Electron, as according to Cooperative, even if you have a valid unexpired Visa Electron Card - it isn't an Electron Card anymore.

    To the consumer, who has a Visa Electron card in their hand, and have selected payment type as 'Electron' in order to avoid fees, it looks as if the Cooperative has phased out Visa Electron long before the existing expiry date of the cards, by this subtle back end system change.

    If you are charged this fee on an Electron Card, I suggest you query it with Cooperative Bank.
  • I'm not surprised that a lender is trying this approach, but I AM surprised it's the Co-Op. You'd have thought it would be those dastardly Americans, not the cuddly old purveyors of Green Shield Stamps.

    I thought the co-op issued their own cuddly blue dividend stamps. Green shield stamps were issued by nasty-ole commercial companies! I remember our local green shield stamp centre became an Argos with an almost identical catalogue.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.