We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! However well-intentioned, for the safety of other users we ask that you refrain from seeking or offering medical advice. This includes recommendations for medicines, procedures or over-the-counter remedies. Posts or threads found to be in breach of this rule will be removed.📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Buying a slow cooker (which? & why?)
Comments
-
How economical are they to use? If they are on for hours surely you use alot of electricity? My husband is worried I am gonna send the bill sky high if I buy one.
Also which would you recommend. It would be only for a maximum of 3 people. There's this one...
argos
...and this one...
argos
Big difference price wise but I am not sure if I should go for the cheaper one because I havent used one before or to go for the more expensive one because it is better quality?
Suggestions please !0 -
I'd definitely recommend the second one, which is what many of us on this forum use as it's big enough to contain a whole chicken or leg of lamb. They cook perfectly in there and the meat just falls from the bones :drool:
They hardly use any electric at all and I think someone mentioned that a slowcooker being on for 6-8 hours was equivalent to an electric hob ring being on for around 20 mins!
Just think of all the lovely winter casseroles and soups you can make and come home from work on a cold evening to the delicious smell of dinner ready and waiting!"An Ye Harm None, Do What Ye Will"
~
It is that what you do, good or bad,
will come back to you three times as strong!
0 -
They use about as much electricity as a light bulb I was once told, but whether this was a low-energy one or not I don't know! :rotfl:Sealed Pot Challenge #8 £341.90
Sealed Pot Challenge #9 £162.98
Sealed Pot Challenge #10 £33.10
Sealed Pot Challenge #11 Member #360 -
I've got the first one. It works just fine for me. I don't use it every night, about once a week and everything I've cooked in in has turned out nice. When it dies, I will probably get one like the second picture though. Having said that I bet the darned thing will outlive me. :rolleyes:Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia.0
-
LOL! well I'm sure TM has one that is well over 20 years old and still going strong, and I think MATH also had a pretty ancient one before it died
I think there's a few that are still knocking around here from the 70's/80's (slow cookers that is, although there's a few posters too!) especially the Tower ones, so you might have a long wait for it to conk out :rotfl:"An Ye Harm None, Do What Ye Will"
~
It is that what you do, good or bad,
will come back to you three times as strong!
0 -
Yep - I have a prestige one that was mum's so nearly 30yo. I have a Tower one which is 20 yo (although not used much
) and I have the 2nd one you show too. Absolutely brilliant, wouldn't be without one and even if there are only 3 of you, they make whole chickens and legs of lamb divine. Also, you can cook whole cheaper cuts like brisket and lamb shoulders or shanks till they melt, and what little you use in leccy, would be more than made up for in the fact that you've saved it on the meat in the first place.
0 -
I was also wondering how economical they are - I work from home so the benefit of coming in to a ready meal isn't an issue but would it be cheaper to cook a casserole in a slow cooker than in my fan oven for 2 hours?0
-
kscour wrote:I was also wondering how economical they are - I work from home so the benefit of coming in to a ready meal isn't an issue but would it be cheaper to cook a casserole in a slow cooker than in my fan oven for 2 hours?
I was a housewife till recently and I found one advantage of a slowcooker is that it doesn't give off much heat which was a huge bonus during the hot days of summer.
Even when you're at home all day it can be easier to just bung dinner in the slowcooker and forget about it, if you have to pop out to buy supplies or visit a client (or whatever your job entails) then dinner takes care of itself. If you go out at the weekends the slowcooker cooks dinner while the family has a trip to the beach or the football.
I understand that slowcookers are cheaper than ovens, the usual quote is that they use as much electricity as a lightbulb.0 -
hi, i just bought a slowcooker book from Amazon,it states... uses less fuel then an oven and costs only the price of a light bulb to run!0
-
I've just converted my sister to slow-cookers, although to be fair, she did used to have one until ex dropped it
She's about to start working 12 hour days so can have a meal ready for the rest of the family when they get home.
Thanks for the link to Argos, didn't realise they were so cheap. I'll pick one up for her next week.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.7K Life & Family
- 256.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards