We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Crash just started. 40% by mid 2009.

12346

Comments

  • zcacmxi
    zcacmxi Posts: 136 Forumite
    ad9898 wrote: »
    Have you got mixed up with the Euro ?, the pound is at $1.52 today, 1.18 Euros to the pound.

    Yes, correct. 1.18 is Euro. Today pound buys $1.52.

    So falls are: 18% off Average, 28% off High & 4% up on High.. Not as bad a previous post, but not insignificant against a currency which is also under pressure.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Would you like to revise the -25% nedeed to hit -40% by the end of June 09 after seing todays figures?
  • pararct
    pararct Posts: 777 Forumite
    File on four had a pretty bearish view the other night on its program and gave examples of how in some circumstances values were down 60%+...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00fl0jg/File_on_4_25112008/

    Clearly a fundamental understanding on how the whole market works and more importantly where it is financed from is required before anyone can even start to hazard a guess on where we are headed.

    All I will say say is the Government are deploying ever desperate measures to kick start things and seem desperate to re-inflate the housing market.. Brown and Darling even say as much.

    It's almost as they see it as the common denominator for all the Country's problems.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    pararct wrote: »
    File on four had a pretty bearish view the other night on its program and gave examples of how in some circumstances values were down 60%+...

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00fl0jg/File_on_4_25112008/

    But that is the point 60% fall on one newbuild flat does not mean all houses have fallen 60%.

    Average sales prices are a true reflection of the market as a whole.
    But if you are purchasing have a look at your local data falls could be higher or lower than average.
  • zcacmxi
    zcacmxi Posts: 136 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    Would you like to revise the -25% nedeed to hit -40% by the end of June 09 after seing todays figures?

    Today's figures show that the rate of the HPC slowed during November, and if they continued at this rate then we will not see -25% in 6 months.

    However, due to the current economic volatility, job losses, companies entering administration, it is too early to call a recovery..

    In the current climate, will people rush out in Spring 2009 and buy up all the unsold property from the previous 18 months? Or will sellers have to start reducing further...
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    zcacmxi wrote: »
    Today's figures show that the rate of the HPC slowed during November, and if they continued at this rate then we will not see -25% in 6 months.

    However, due to the current economic volatility, job losses, companies entering administration, it is too early to call a recovery..

    In the current climate, will people rush out in Spring 2009 and buy up all the unsold property from the previous 18 months? Or will sellers have to start reducing further...

    no, but because the average house takes three months to compleat, people would have to accept offers of 40% from peak now and until the end of March to get 40% from peak falls.
    Their aint enough repos to support that sorry. Falls will happen but not at the speed you want.
    Drops will now be around 16-18% from peak by the end of Dec (18 months) you need a 350% crash increase to get to your figure for end of June..
    It aint gona happen mate but good luck trying.
  • Really2 wrote: »
    no, but beacuse the average house takes three months to complet people would have to accept offers of 40% from peak now and until the end of March to get 40% from peak falls.
    Their aint enough repos to support that sorry. Falls will happen but not at the speed you want.
    Drops will now be around 16-18% from peak by the end of Dec (18 months) you need a 350% crash increase to get to your figure for end of June..
    It aint gona happen mate but good luck trying.

    I think those people expecting 50-70% falls are only in the "denial" stage of grief, although some are clearly approaching the "anger" stage.
    eg "Why is Broon trying to prop up the housing market by helping the banks out - I demand repossessions, I demand misery for others, its not fair. No! No! No! - how can this happen"
    US housing: it's not a bubble

    Moneyweek, December 2005
  • moanymoany
    moanymoany Posts: 2,877 Forumite
    What is happening now with the demise of Woolworths and MFI is the tip of the iceberg. Robert Peston says

    Unless something can be done to persuade the big providers of credit insurance to reinstate cover - and that would probably require taxpayers to provide some kind of guarantee - Woolies will not be the last substantial victim.

    and as that insurance sector is tightening up it is unlikely that they will put massive sums at risk in a situation where the retail sector is seeing massive falls in sales.

    There are constant reports in the media and on the threads of redundancies and reduced hours. We know of factories taking four week Christmas breaks, all in all it does not inspire confidence in the housing market having the factors in place to have even a stabilised level of fall.

    In May this year there were posters on this board who were hotly disputing that there would be the falls that there already have been. Only a very few forecasters predicted the events of the past 6 months. Even now there are forecasters on Bloomberg warning that AIG is not safe. The global economy is in unchartered waters, the only thing the majority of commentators can agree on is that it is going to get worse.

    Given all of that, house prices are only heading down. I think we would all have been better off if there had been control and restraint in lending. If I had said that in the recent past I would have been accused of not wanting everyone to own their own house! Now, by stating facts and saying that house prices will fall to 40%, that despite the possible 3 month period of grace that there are going to be a lot of re-pessessions, the accusation is that people are taking pleasure in re-possessions and misery!
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    moanymoany wrote: »
    ! Now, by stating facts and saying that house prices will fall to 40%, that despite the possible 3 month period of grace that there are going to be a lot of re-pessessions, the accusation is that people are taking pleasure in re-possessions and misery!

    I think around 30%, it could be 40% just not by the middle of June 09.
    Is it wrong to disagree when all pointers are saying they won't fall to that in the time frame the OP says?:confused:
  • dopester
    dopester Posts: 4,890 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    See my industry is different there is end of line distressed stock which is cheap but it is a case of buy it or lose it.
    It may not come up again. People can not buy an equiverlent at distressed prices in I.T. You either buy it or lose out.

    What about the contractors and employees in IT? My understanding is that there are downward pressures on wages there. Much by way of over-supply except at top-levels where high skills command top money.

    Lower wages, a population tapped-out = lower final value product fee.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.