We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
PCN issued in residential permit-only car park
Options

b_enji
Posts: 20 Forumite
I am the leaseholder for a flat with an unallocated parking space. I have recently been letting the parking space out for a decent sum, since I no longer own the car. Today the tenant has received a Parking Charge Notice from the building. The reason is "not authorised", other relevant options being "No Permit," "Not In Bay," "Obstructive Parking," "Parked in Disabled Bay."
To be clear, the tenant uses and displays a valid permit (which was displayed today, photos held as evidence) and signage in the car park is very clear that only cars with valid permits are permitted to use the car park. It does not make any reference to being "authorised" or that registration numbers should be lodged with the property management.
I should point out that recently it has come to light that the terms of our leases do not permit the letting of spaces, and accordingly notice has been given to my tenant who is vacating shortly. This is clearly though a separate issue to the PCN.
My view is, notwithstanding my own indiscretion in letting the space out, the PCN is unenforcable because the terms of the contract as per the signage (valid permits only) have been met. Therefore there hasn't been a breach of contract and so I don't think they have a leg to stand on.
Do other forumites agree? Very grateful for any advice - I have read the residential permit thread but I think this is more geared towards residents who might be unloading/loading such that a fine would be unreasonable.
I have in the first instance contacted the property management to say the charge is not enforceable but think I should go to the parking firm. I believe they are an IPC member.
To be clear, the tenant uses and displays a valid permit (which was displayed today, photos held as evidence) and signage in the car park is very clear that only cars with valid permits are permitted to use the car park. It does not make any reference to being "authorised" or that registration numbers should be lodged with the property management.
I should point out that recently it has come to light that the terms of our leases do not permit the letting of spaces, and accordingly notice has been given to my tenant who is vacating shortly. This is clearly though a separate issue to the PCN.
My view is, notwithstanding my own indiscretion in letting the space out, the PCN is unenforcable because the terms of the contract as per the signage (valid permits only) have been met. Therefore there hasn't been a breach of contract and so I don't think they have a leg to stand on.
Do other forumites agree? Very grateful for any advice - I have read the residential permit thread but I think this is more geared towards residents who might be unloading/loading such that a fine would be unreasonable.
I have in the first instance contacted the property management to say the charge is not enforceable but think I should go to the parking firm. I believe they are an IPC member.
0
Comments
-
The newbies faq thread tells you how to find out which association the ppc belongs to
(Read up in the FAQ about the futility of appeals to IPC companies)
So if it's an IPC company, then concentrate your efforts on getting these cancelled by the landowner/agent0 -
Thanks, they are definitely an IPC company. Looks like I should pursue the managing agent in the first instance.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards