PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.Ownership of Land
Options
Comments
-
What's the possibility of the land being developed behind the fence on the land adjacent to the neighbours. As this could provide an access road. Be surprised if the developers would have left it this way without good reason.0
-
behind it is a toilet sump thing that services the street. Behind that is a lot of unclaimed land.
Everyone around here argues over it, which is why I don't want this to happen0 -
behind it is a toilet sump thing that services the street.0
-
There is a document associated with planning application reference LW/89/0091 which has a general layout plan on page 2 of 3.
That plan shows the boundary of plot 5 (which is now house number 6) being a rectangle excluding the area in dispute. Although that isn't conclusive proof of ownership, it at least gives an indication of what was intended at the time the application was approved.
There is another application LW/86/0209 which unfortunately says the documents are too large to be viewed online, but refers to LW/85/1785 "Outline application for erection of eight dwellings with estate road".
I suspect the application LW/85/1785 might give you the answer you are looking for.
I also note from the plan that the sewer running along the road passes under this disputed land - I assume into the sump (probably a pumping station?) behind the fence.
At a guess, the pumping station (if that is what it is) may be the property of the water company, and it is possible the area you are concerned about is a parking space provided for maintenance vehicles for the pumping station. In which case the owner might be the water company, not the developer or council.
And regardless of ownership, whoever is responsible for the pumping station should be concerned if their access from the public highway might be prevented by a land ownership claim.... if the land genuinely has no owner (I'd be very surprised) then it would appear to me the best claim to it would be the water company, or whoever is responsible for the pumping station. If you know what I mean"In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"0 -
Finally been able to download LW/85/1785.
The area is marked on the plan (page 2 of 4) as "Area reserved for foul sewer pumping station""In the future, everyone will be rich for 15 minutes"0 -
As suggested above,
* tea and cake time
If that fails
a) research ownership (at least 3 possibilities so far in the thread. edit: 4 now, see below)
b) start parking there yourself on a regular basis. This will present an Adverse Possession claim.
c) put up a camera with date stamped recording. This will
i) protect you car while parked there, and
ii) provide evidence in future that they have not had sole use of the land0 -
Are you sure it's unregistered? Doing a Map Enquiry with the Land Registry, I found there are two areas of registered land, one of which might be the land in question. I placed the centre of my search radius just above the end of Wendale Drive (ie where that land is) and found:
Search results
Properties at the centre of the radius
land on the north side of Telscombe Road, Peacehaven Tenure:
Freehold Price Paid/Value Stated Data: No
land on the East side of Wendale Drive, Peacehaven Tenure:
Freehold Price Paid/Value Stated Data: No
Properties within the radius
5, Wendale Drive, Peacehaven, BN10 8NX Tenure:
Freehold Price Paid/Value Stated Data: Yes
edit: I wouldn't normally post identifying names/addresses, but you've already identified the address yourself. If you decide to anonymise the address and delete your own identifying post, PM me and I'll also delete.0 -
Finally been able to download LW/85/1785.
The area is marked on the plan (page 2 of 4) as "Area reserved for foul sewer pumping station"
Where can I download this from please? Is this showing the part in front of the station, i.e. the part they are trying to claim?
Thank you so much for all of the efforts0 -
Are you sure it's unregistered? Doing a Map Enquiry with the Land Registry, I found there are two areas of registered land, one of which might be the land in question. I placed the centre of my search radius just above the end of Wendale Drive (ie where that land is) and found:
Search results
Properties at the centre of the radius
land on the north side of Telscombe Road, Peacehaven Tenure:
Freehold Price Paid/Value Stated Data: No
land on the East side of Wendale Drive, Peacehaven Tenure:
Freehold Price Paid/Value Stated Data: No
Properties within the radius
5, Wendale Drive, Peacehaven, BN10 8NX Tenure:
Freehold Price Paid/Value Stated Data: Yes
edit: I wouldn't normally post identifying names/addresses, but you've already identified the address yourself. If you decide to anonymise the address and delete your own identifying post, PM me and I'll also delete.
Sorry that link didn't work. It must be unregistered though as the council are saying if I do not reply by 8th December the land will become theirs.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 343.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 250.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 449.7K Spending & Discounts
- 235.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 608.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 173.1K Life & Family
- 248K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards