PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tenant wants rent reduction - but is he entitled?

245

Comments

  • Guest101
    Guest101 Posts: 15,764 Forumite
    bigbananas wrote: »
    No we didn't provide any alternative heating as we were told he had some already and that he wasn't staying at the house anyway.

    Although the rent we are getting and the cost of the repair should be irrelevant they are real world issues that make giving him 2 weeks compensation difficult. Obviously we aren't monsters and we try to put ourselves in his situation where we would probably want compensation also. But if it's not written in law that we have to give him the equivilant of the exact number of days he was not comfortable at the property then it falls to a negotiation. And we cannot afford to hand over 2 weeks rent due to the for-mentioned financial facts. So, we would offer 1 weeks rent because it is a fair amount based on assuming he suffered no financial loss by staying at his mums house.

    1: your personal circumstances are irrelevant.
    2: he has suffered a loss, two weeks rent for a property he could not use.
    3: there is a clear law, it just does not specify what the compensation should be. he could always take you to court and you end up paying more in costs.
    4: hope he accepts 1 week returned
  • Guest101 wrote: »
    2: he has suffered a loss, two weeks rent for a property he could not use.
    True. Very simple, yet that has hit the nail on the head. I guess 2 weeks it is then.
  • Thanks for all your thoughts and advice guys! I'll have to give him the 2 weeks reduction.
    It's a right kick in the balls to have to shell out £600 for a boiler repair just 1 month before selling! I'll just be glad to be shot of this property!
  • dodger1
    dodger1 Posts: 4,579 Forumite
    Guest101 wrote: »
    1: your personal circumstances are irrelevant.
    2: he has suffered a loss, two weeks rent for a property he could not use.
    3: there is a clear law, it just does not specify what the compensation should be. he could always take you to court and you end up paying more in costs.
    4: hope he accepts 1 week returned

    But is that true, OP says that they were told tenant had alternative heating. Personally I'd want to know why the tenant moved out if he did indeed have a different source of heat before deciding on any compensation.
    It's someone else's fault.
  • jjlandlord
    jjlandlord Posts: 5,099 Forumite
    While you should indeed offer something, your tenant is clearly taking the p*ss and that's not a good sign for the future.

    Your offer is a 50% discount over the affected period, which is generous.
  • mchale
    mchale Posts: 1,886 Forumite
    bigbananas wrote: »
    I'll no doubt just have to give the greedy git what he wants!


    If you are going to pay compensation, pay it at the end of the tenancy when you have vacant possession, it's a incentive for the tenant to leave place clean & tidy etc etc etc.
    ANURADHA KOIRALA ??? go on throw it in google.
  • bigbananas wrote: »
    True. Very simple, yet that has hit the nail on the head. I guess 2 weeks it is then.

    Be very careful taking advice from guest101 - he has a long history of giving dodgy advice on here and has admitted he has absolutely no training or expertise in tenancy law.

    As has already been said by others your tenant is not automatically entitled to 2 weeks rent reduction. Even if he took you to court he would have to demonstrate that you didnt make reasonable attempts to have it fixed asap. In reality, what are the chances of him taking you to court for 2 weeks rent when he has suffered no material loss? Very slim id imagine.

    Any reduction/compensation you offer is at your discretion and should reflect how well you think it may encourage him to accommodate your attempt to sell the house.
  • usa1
    usa1 Posts: 538 Forumite
    Give him the 2 weeks reduction. Then give him notice to leave your property and get a T in who is paying the market-rate


    Your T will try it on again and again....
    It's not the despair, Laura. I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand. ~ Brian Stimpson, Clockwise
  • Better_Days
    Better_Days Posts: 2,742 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped!
    My boiler packed up last month (sods law, January and not July!) and I can sympathise with your tenant. It really was very cold. We did use elec heaters but given the cost I wouldn't have wanted to run them for 2 weeks.

    OP you do realise that you are restricting your potential pool of buyers if you try and sell with a tenant in place (even if he has given notice and agreed to leave).

    Also bear in mind if you want to have viewings whilst your tenant is still living there it will be disruptive for him. In addition could refuse to tidy up and boil haddock and cabbage during every viewing. I suppose you could offer to refund the two weeks rent on the understanding that he keeps the place tidy for viewings. He may well wish to be present during viewings - I know I did.
    It is a good idea to be alone in a garden at dawn or dark so that all its shy presences may haunt you and possess you in a reverie of suspended thought.
    James Douglas
  • mchale wrote: »
    If you are going to pay compensation, pay it at the end of the tenancy when you have vacant possession, it's a incentive for the tenant to leave place clean & tidy etc etc etc.

    Very nice idea. I think I'll go with that.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.9K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.2K Life & Family
  • 258.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.