Wife didn't update DVLA with new address. Got a parking ticket we didn't realise which is now a CCJ!

DRAFT ORDER

IN THE COUNTY COURT AT: Northampton

National Parking Management (Claimant)

And

MISS FIRSTNAME MAIDENNAME (Defendant)

CLAIM No: XXXXXXX

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The default judgment dated 25/04/2018 be set aside.

2. Costs to be reserved.

3. Unless the Claimant serves a copy of the claim form on the Defendant by 4pm on XX/XX/19 paragraph 2 shall cease to have effect and the Claimant shall pay the Defendant's costs summarily assessed at £255 and the claim shall be struck out.

4. If the Claimant serves the claim form as directed in paragraph 3 the Defendant shall file and serve a defence by 4pm on XX/XX/2019.

5. Should the Claimant discontinue the Claim after the CCJ is set aside, paragraph 2 shall cease to have effect and the Claimant shall pay the Defendant's costs summarily assessed at £255 plus the Defendant's costs for attending the hearing.

6. All enforcement be put on hold pending the outcome of the application.

WITNESS STATEMENT

7. I am FIRST NAME MAIDEN NAME and I am the defendant in this matter. This is my supporting statement to my application dated 24/05/2019 August 2019 requesting to:

a. Set aside the default judgment dated 25th April November 2018 as it was defectively served using an old address.

b. Order for the claimant to pay the defendant £255 as reimbursement for the set aside fee.

c. Order for the original claim to be dismissed.

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

8. I understand that the claimant obtained a default judgment against me on 25th April 2018. However, it was not served at my current address, therefore I was not aware of the county court judgment until a few weeks ago when a credit check indicated a CCJ on my credit report. I understand that this claim was served at 17 ADDRESS. However, I moved to a new address on 29th January 2016 which can be proved by the signed tenancy agreement (appendix a)

9. I have never received any correspondence from the claimant, therefore I was never able to challenge the original charge nor the judgment.

10. I have never received any correspondence and at no point prior to 25th April 2018 did I have any contact with the claimant.

11. I believe the claimant has behaved unreasonably by not ensuring they used my correct contact details. According to publicly available information my circumstances are far from being unique. National Parking Managements persistent failure to use correct and current addresses results in an unnecessary burden for individuals and the justice system.

12. I suggest the claimant did not make reasonable enquiries as to my current address before perusing the court order especially considering they had good reason to believe they did not hold my current contact details. Furthermore, considering they received no response from me to their correspondence this should have been a clear indication of the obsolescence of the address 17 St Georges Place.

13. The claimant was able to obtain my correct and current address after (25th April 2018) to make me aware of the money owed but only after such time that a CCJ had been passed. This clearly demonstrates that they were aware that they did not have the correct address at the time of perusing the court order but only decided to update their information after it would be too late for me to defend the claim.

14. Considering the above I was unable to defend this claim. Therefore, I believe that the default judgment against me was irregular and I respectfully request it is set aside.

ORDER DISMISSING THE CLAIM

15. I further believe that the original parking charge notice has no merit and should thus be dismissed. The claimant is a parking company which seeks to claim for parking charge notices which the claimant believes are due as a result of an alleged breach of contract for parking by a driver.

16. The claimant has obtained details of the vehicle for which the defendant was the registered keeper and used those details to raise a parking charge notice. I dispute this charge in its entirety as I do not know the wording of the contract nor do I know the means by which the contract was alleged to have come into force.

17. If the claimant can evidence that the alleged incident relates to the vehicle AS99 ZXY any notice to keeper issued by the claimant must comply with Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Otherwise, the claimant is required to prove the driver of the vehicle they claim was involved in the alleged incident. I submit that the claimant cannot provide such evidence and further submit that the claimant does not include Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 ; wording on the parking charge notices they issue and therefore cannot hold the registered keeper of the vehicle automatically liable.

18. A requirement of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 is that any notice to keeper must be served within 14 days of the date of the alleged incident. Since I have not received any documentation I submit the claimant has not complied with the requirements of the Act and thus cannot claim this charge against me as the registered keeper in any case.

19. I further submit that the parking charge notice is without merit due to substantial issues in law. This is for the following reasons:

a. Lack of Standing by Claimant: The claimant is not the landowner of the car park in question and will have no proprietary interest in it. This means that the claimant, as a matter of law, will have no locus standi to litigate in their own name. Any consideration will have been provided by the landholder and only they would have been able claim for any damages or trespass.

b. No Loss Suffered by Claimant: Their claim is presumably based on damages for alleged breach of contract. It is a fundamental principle of English Law that a party who suffers damages through breach of contract can only seek through court action to be put back in the same position as they would have been if the breach had not occurred. In order to do so they must demonstrate their actual or genuine pre-estimate of loss. I submit that no loss has been suffered by the claimant as a result of any alleged breaches of contract on the part of any driver of the vehicle of which I was the registered keeper. I further submit that any loss to the landowner (which would be the only party able to claim such losses) would be minimal.

c. The Charge is an Unenforceable Penalty: I further submit that the parking charge is nothing but an unenforceable penalty as it is not based on any loss suffered due to the alleged infraction.

d. No Contract with the Claimant: Any contract must have offer, acceptance, and consideration both ways. There would not have been consideration from the claimant to the driver. Therefore, there is no consideration from the driver to National Parking Management.

20. On this basis I believe that the claimant has not provided any reasonable cause of action and thus the claim should be dismissed in its entirety.

21. In order to make informed decisions and statements in my defence as former keeper of the vehicle I will require copies of all paperwork and pictures of all signs from the claimant.

Statement of Truth:
I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Is it this place, do you see similarities in post #22 'Tenant's Duties/Rights'?

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5649274/4-pcns-in-7-days-in-residential-carpark

Same company and town! Slightly different issue as it was parking on the street my wife got hit with. Parking on the street was allowed for the first 12 months or so then some ambiguous signs went up over night in the car park that also apparently referred to the street as well...

Thank you. One final quick question if I may. I know if sending by post I need three copies. Is that still necessary if delivering by hand?