We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

No building regs certificate & indemnity insurance

My partner and I are currently buying a house that has multiple extensions. For a ground floor extension they have planning permission and the relevant building regs completion certificates.
1) For a first storey extension (on top of the ground floor extension) They applied for planning permission but never got the building regs completion certificate. The seller has offered to provide indemnity insurance to cover lack of certificate (so only covers against the council asking us to take down/change the extension) there is no cover for any bad workmanship.
Should we request that an indemnity policy should also cover this? (Does such a policy even exist) and will our buildings insurance cover us if anything structural ever happens to said extension if we don't have the completion certificate.
2) There is a rear extension that we've found out is covering a public drain. The seller's (who built the extension) did not get permission from the local water authority to build over it. Our mortgage lender is insisting we have indemnity insurance for this but the seller is refusing to pay for it. We don't see why we should foot the bill for something that isn't our error... thoughts?

Thanks for any replies/advice

Comments

  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    JMCF81 wrote: »
    The seller has offered to provide indemnity insurance to cover lack of certificate (so only covers against the council asking us to take down/change the extension) there is no cover for any bad workmanship.
    Should we request that an indemnity policy should also cover this?
    Compliance with building regs doesn't guarantee anything about the standard of workmanship, other than it complied with the bare minimum - or that it hasn't deteriorated since it was built. You verify its condition via your survey. The same goes for the rest of the house, of course (have you seen the consents for it?).
    will our buildings insurance cover us if anything structural ever happens to said extension if we don't have the completion certificate.
    Buildings insurance covers you for the risks specified in the policy, which don't include remedying poor workmanship - but you'd still be covered if e.g. the dodgy electrics start a fire.
    We don't see why we should foot the bill for something that isn't our error... thoughts?
    How much is the policy, and is it worth jeopardising the whole transaction over it?
  • RedFraggle
    RedFraggle Posts: 1,522 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Depending on when the drain was built over and what it serves, an agreement may not have been required
    Officially in a clique of idiots
  • JMCF81
    JMCF81 Posts: 24 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thank you for your speedy reply. With regards to the buildings insurance we're concerned if the structure of the extension wasn't built correctly and remedial work was required to make it safe etc... would our insurance pay out ?
  • JMCF81
    JMCF81 Posts: 24 Forumite
    Sixth Anniversary 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    Both our and the seller's solicitor has highlighted the permission was indeed required to build over the drain.
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    JMCF81 wrote: »
    Thank you for your speedy reply. With regards to the buildings insurance we're concerned if the structure of the extension wasn't built correctly and remedial work was required to make it safe etc... would our insurance pay out ?
    Like I said:
    davidmcn wrote: »
    Buildings insurance covers you for the risks specified in the policy, which don't include remedying poor workmanship
    It's your surveyor you rely on to confirm the property is structurally sound, not your insurance.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.