We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Hard Drives!
Comments
-
-
Would be like saying AMD's aren't very good as they run too hot.
while it's certainly fair to say that hitachi may well have turned things around, the deathstar drives: 65/120GXP are usually given as the reason IBM finally got out of the HDD business. (although i believe they still have a 30% share in the hitachi operation) something like that and the very high number of failures that went along with it is clearly going to leave a lasting memory for those who have experienced it. in many cases (and in many industries) this sort of thing is enough to put people off a brand, not just a product, for good.
the OP asked for opinions on a selection of drives and got them - regardless of what they are like now i wouldn't use a hitachi drive over a maxtor or a seagate as they have never let me down.
not sure i quite understand the above quote though - it's accepted fact that the afore mentioned drives suffered excessive levels of failure. to the best of my knowledge AMD processors do run hot but this has not lead to mass failures nor have AMD suffered mass failures for any other reason afaik? so how is saying the old deathstar drives were bobbins (which they were) at all like saying AMD aren't any good because they run hot?
"Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first." (Mark Twain)0 -
smcicr wrote:the OP asked for opinions on a selection of drives and got them - regardless of what they are like now i wouldn't use a hitachi drive over a maxtor or a seagate as they have never let me down.
True, although it's rebranded, and things have definitely been turned around. I can't say for myself as I don't have one, but from the review I've read it'd be a drive worth considering.smcicr wrote:not sure i quite understand the above quote though - it's accepted fact that the afore mentioned drives suffered excessive levels of failure. to the best of my knowledge AMD processors do run hot but this has not lead to mass failures nor have AMD suffered mass failures for any other reason afaik? so how is saying the old deathstar drives were bobbins (which they were) at all like saying AMD aren't any good because they run hot?
I didn't mean it like that. I wasn't implying AMD's suffer from failure. I was saying that because they used to run hot, does not mean they do so now (which they don't). I think the same applies to the Hitachi drives, given the problems were 3 years ago, it's under new management, and they've been getting great reviews. They used to fail, but doesn't mean they will now.
Personally, I've got Maxtors and they've done me fine, but I wouldn't stick with them purely for that reason. Much like I switched from Intel to AMD, I'll always look around and buy what's best at the current time."Boonowa tweepi, ha, ha."0 -
The seagate barracudas ever since SATA was released, have always been and are still the drive to match.DONE: Great North Run 09! Raised £452 for the National Autistic Society
SOON: Cycling John O'Groats to Lands End! For the National Autistic Society
Please sponsor Me! http://www.justgiving.com/sean-parkin
Debtwatch - Flexiloan (£1844 - £0 by July 11) - Personal Loan (Closed Jan10!) - Egg CC (Closed June 09!) - Tesco CC (Closed May 10!)0 -
@wolfman - got it, see what you're saying now
"Don't go around saying the world owes you a living. The world owes you nothing. It was here first." (Mark Twain)0 -

Generally it's all much of a muchness as hard drives are difficult to test due to being inconsistent at times. Manufacturers aside, if possible get something along the lines of a SATA, 7,200rpm, 8mb (or even 16mb) cache drive and you should do fine. 200gb or 250gb will give you adequate space."Boonowa tweepi, ha, ha."0 -
FAT32 doesn't allow large files to be edited and messed with(2GB+)
It's actually 4GB maximum file size with FAT32.How many surrealists does it take to change a lightbulb?
...
...
...
...
Fish0 -
COVKID wrote:Just bought a Western Digital 250gig for £59.99 from Aldi in Coventry understand they have them in Rugby as well. See shop but don't drop today 12.18am
Yes Rugby store still has plenty at £59Chocolate is the solution to all life's problems. Life happens, also coffee helps.0 -
Thanks to all for your input and information.
I'm looking to do video work so obviously size and speed are important. After thinking it through I'm reluctant to go for more than 200GB drive incase it corrupts and crashes. Having 2/3 separate drives is a safer option.
I was looking at https://www.pcpro.co.uk and they seem to recommend Maxtor DiamondMax 10. Any thoughts?
I notice terms such as SATA, IDE, cache, etc have been used in previous posts - I'm afraid that technical jargon has lost me! If possible could someone advise in simple terms the best course of action. My preference at the moment is to go with Maxtor. Thanks.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
