We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Halifax Figs for May -2.4%
Comments
-
Halifax use that 3 month rolling average so the real year on year drop is a whopping -6.3%
Crash crash crash!!!0 -
pickles110564 wrote: »
they did help FTB's, all new developments have to have some affordable housing.
Unless the builder pays the charge / fee / bribe to exempt them from that requirement, of course.
q.v. Michael Meacher and his development in London.0 -
Are these seasonally adjusted figures, like the Nationwide? who I believe I read somewhere, adjusted them the opposite way to the way they normally adjust them at this time of year.Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes.0
-
baby_boomer wrote: »b) the government has first promised to help first time buyers on the housing ladder
showing its strong credentials in economic understanding :rotfl:
I was thinking more of the £100m they promised in April 2008 before the Crewe 'n Nantwich debacle.pickles110564 wrote: »
they did help FTB's, all new developments have to have some affordable housing.
"£100m for shared equity schemes to help first-time buyers purchase new-build homes"
Alice Miles in the Times thinks it's a scandal that taxpayers' money is being used to encourate first time buyers into the housing market in order to stabilise a dodgy situation0 -
-
pickles110564 wrote: »:j
Houses must be selling then.
HPI here we come.
I'm not convinced you believe what you post old thing. Prices and volumes are down. The banks aren't lending and most people don't have the cash to buy. You know these things and there's no amount of bluster will reverse where prices are headed. The only questions are how much do they fall and for how long.
As Yazz might have said, "The only way is down, Ba-a-by".0 -
pickles110564 wrote: »:j
Houses must be selling then.
HPI here we come.
Houses will continue to sell in even the worst/toughest markets or did you think that the house market consisted of people only moving around for a hobby/leisure time activity?--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.0 -
Question for you guys? Given that we are in a falling market, what will happen to the myriad new build developments still in progress in most cities? Do you think these developers will still turn a profit?0
-
Experts an officials keep puting the blame on those who have overextended their borrowing and not considered long term afordabilty. They point the finger at house buyers ...but ...isn' there a saying about leading from the top down?
The government's financial policy does seem to fit this bill as well as any over extende buyer right?
Difference is, we, the public step into save the country through fiscal means, whereas the governments moves to help people get on he ladder OR into suitable rented accomodation are at best optimistic. I wonder what the government would say if we all said, 'Hey guys, we haven't put enough asie for a rainy day and just can't fulfil or taxation obligations, so I'm going to give you, my tax minus 4% to help counteract the differece between wage and increased cost of living.' The govenment have us as a permanant source of income, but if we are suffering financially, is it similar to the subprime lenders suffering with increase defaults?
OMG, I'm starting to sound like I spend a lot of time here.......0 -
Looking at the Halifax report the index has gone down from 635.9 in March to 595.9 in May. This is 6.3% decline over three months, if this trend continued for the next 9 months prices next March would be down over 25% on March 2008. I struggle to see how they can remain so positive in their commentary considering the real squeeze on availability of mortgages, cost of mortgages and increase in fuel/food costs only happened in the last three months.
Quote Martin Ellis Chief Economist:
"House prices fell by 2.4% in May. Price falls should be measured against the significant gains in recent years. The average UK house price rose by more than £88,000, or 79%, between August 2002 and August 2007.
The decline in prices is caused by the difficulties created for potential house purchasers by the rapid rise in house prices in the last few years, a squeeze on spending power and the reduction in credit availability. These factors have curbed housing demand. High employment levels, low interest rates and a shortage of new homes support housing valuations."
Who are they kidding about low interest rates!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards