We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Exchanged contracts - and the ceiling has fallen down!

2»

Comments

  • barnaby-bear
    barnaby-bear Posts: 4,142 Forumite
    minimike2 wrote: »
    At exchange of contracts you are advised to get your own insurance in place for a reason!

    So I guess it just depends on what type of person you are.

    In case you encounter ar5eholes like this and they flit the country.... hopefully the OP will be hunted down though....
  • barnaby-bear
    barnaby-bear Posts: 4,142 Forumite
    Catblue wrote: »
    I thought that the buyers had to have buildings insurance in place for the property from the date at which they exchanged contracts.

    Would not the buyer's insurance be liable for this?

    As a general point, this is one of the risks when there is a long time between exchange and completion.

    They would pay up so the buyer could get it fixed then recover the monies from the seller/their insurer.... it's their house....
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,531 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    You have insurance from exchange as you are committed to complete. Solicitors usually advise sellers to keep their insurance going until completion in case problems like this occur.

    Effectively the property is insured by both parties between exchange and completion.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • silvercar wrote: »
    You have insurance from exchange as you are committed to complete. Solicitors usually advise sellers to keep their insurance going until completion in case problems like this occur.

    Effectively the property is insured by both parties between exchange and completion.

    Where risk passes to the buyer on exchange of contracts, he would be well advised to insure the property from exchange, since otherwise he will have to fund any accidental damage to the property out of his own pocket, subject to:
    • Section 47 of the Law of Property Act 1925, which states that where, after exchange, money becomes payable under any policy of insurance maintained by the seller in respect of damage to the property which he has contracted to sell, that money shall be paid to the buyer at completion (or on receipt of the same by the seller, if later) – note that both the Standard Conditions of Sale (Condition 5.1.4) and the Standard Commercial Property Conditions (Condition 7.1.5) exclude Section 47, and that it is subject to any consent of the insurers which may be required and also subject to payment by the buyer of the proportionate part of the insurance premium from exchange;
    • the seller’s duty to take reasonable care of the property between exchange and completion ppoint.gif.
    However, the seller would also be well advised to maintain his insurance of the property between exchange and completion, in case the buyer defaults on his purchase, and the seller is left with a damaged property and no buyer. Accordingly, it is not unusual for both parties to insure the property between exchange and completion, which may give rise to difficulties if the property is damaged or destroyed by an insured risk between exchange and completion, since each insurer will only pay out to each party half the amount insured.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.1K Life & Family
  • 260.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.