📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

PAL Sipp & Brooks Macdonald Asset Management

135

Comments

  • jem16
    jem16 Posts: 19,653 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    You may think I'm nit picking here but Ed knows full well she is wrong and her only intent was to belittle IFA's as is her hobby.

    If you look back at my posts you will see that I often get at Ed in her bias against IFAs.

    However in this instance I have to say you are nit-picking ;)

    Using her whole quote she said;
    IFAs are not regulated for giving advice on shares or investment trusts.So if you want to buy these you need to go to a stockbroker.

    I think it was quite clear she meant giving advice on shares with the intention of buying them.

    If you read a few more of Ed's posts you will actually find that it's a major admission getting her to say that IFAs are not authorised to recommend individual shares - see post 6 on the thread I linked to Dunstonh's post.

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?p=10717691#post10717691

    Now there she does try to belittle IFAs.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,879 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    IFAs can recommend packaged ITs and can set up SIPPs and other tax wrappers that allow investment into quoted stocks. However, unless the IFA has a stockbroker in house they will not recommend actual unpackaged ITs or shares.

    We can of course comment on stocks and shares and if that particular "option" is suitable for the individual.

    In this case, the IFA is recommending a discretionary fund manager to handle the investments. This is quite a good idea with large funds (£500k plus) if you want a wider range of investment options and management. 3% seems steep in this case unless the IFA is taking on the regulatory responsibility for setting up the SIPP (and I would still say its steep even if they are. A fixed fee would be cheaper).
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • bigbloke45
    bigbloke45 Posts: 2,370 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    b2000, all personal pensions have the same tax breaks. As lots of people have already said, a SIPP is really for someone who wants to do it themselves and has some special knowledge, e.g. a particular property.

    I think you are in danger of spending a lot more money (through charges) but being no better or even worse off at retirement by taking the SIPP option. I think Edinvestor has got the idea in her strapline "Trying to keep it simple"

    Do you really want to pay extra layers of charges for a personal pension?
  • purch wrote: »
    If you are not comfortable making the Investment decisions yourself, then using the full Fund choices of most good Personal Pensions could easily do just as good or even a better job for you.


    Thanks for the guidance but can you expand upon full fund choices. Many Thanks.
  • The policy fee had me rolling around the floor with laughter:£300 + vat yr 1 £200 + vat each year thereafter. With the charges they are applying and the cautious view to investment the 50k is only going to go one way and it sure aint up.

    Cheers for that. In another thread you comment that a trail fee of 1-2% pa is the norm nowadays so is your negativity simply aimed at the 3% set up fee ? Thanks.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,879 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Cheers for that. In another thread you comment that a trail fee of 1-2% pa is the norm nowadays so is your negativity simply aimed at the 3% set up fee ? Thanks.

    Trail of 0.5% is the typical norm. However, that is taken out of the typical annual management charge of 1.5% and not instead of or in addition to.

    The typical maximum is 3% plus 0.5% p.a. The typical average is 1.8% and 0.5% p.a for collectives. The larger your fund, the more you should expect to see the initial to drop.

    The FSA is not at all happy at advisers taking more than 0.5% without them having some evidence and justification of the extra work they are doing to earn that charge. At the moment, some IFAs seem oblivious to that but the FSA have been warning about it for some time and the current FSA inspections seem to be focusing on excessive fees.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    The money is to be invested in a lower risk profile managed portfolio service fund of funds the detail of which is as follows.
    Current Asset Allocation
    Fund, P’cent, Sector
    Invesco Perpetual High Income (inc) 7.0% UK
    Jupiter Income 7.0% UK
    Barcap - UK Acc Growth II 7.0% UK
    Citigroup Autocall VI 5.0% Eu
    Harewood Global Enhanced 6.0% Int
    Barcap - S&P 500 125% 5.0% US
    Standard Life Select 5.0% Property
    New Star International Property 5.0% Property
    Henderson Strategic Corporate Bond I 7.0% Int FI
    Artemis Strategic Bond 8.0% UK FI
    Fidelity Money Builder Income 6.0% UK FI
    Absolute Return Trust 10.0% Hedge
    ML Stepped Income & Growth 6.0% SR
    Bar Cap Euro Ladder 6.0% SR
    Cash 10.0% UK

    One way you could start to get a grip is to look through the list of Standard Life funds available to you (in the link I posted earlier) and see which of the funds the IFA has chosen on his list are already on the SL list.
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    I also thought that this only gave me a single option of purchasing an annuity whereas the SIPP gave me other options

    Did your IFA tell you this, as part of his advice to move your PP to a SIPP ?
    I benefit from the experience of those who are involved daily with the business of investment and am able to benefit from the tax benefits of a SIPP

    You can benefit from the 'experience' by utilising the 240 odd Fund choices within the Standard Life PP......and a SIPP has no additional tax benefits over a PP

    Bottom line is your IFA is going to arrange a SIPP where you invest in Funds no different to those currently available within your current PP, and charge you extra for it !!!!
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,879 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Bottom line is your IFA is going to arrange a SIPP where you invest in Funds no different to those currently available within your current PP, and charge you extra for it !!!!

    As I read this thread, the IFA is not making any fund recommendations. The investments are being handled by a discretionary fund manager. This would typically see the portfolio using shares, investment trusts and other direct investments which are only available on a SIPP and a couple of personal pensions.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    dunstonh wrote: »
    This would typically see the portfolio using shares, investment trusts and other direct investments which are only available on a SIPP and a couple of personal pensions.

    Looking at the list the only investments which wouldn't normally be found in a good PP like the SL one are the "Barcap" funds which I assume are ETFs. But it would probably be quite easy to replace these with conventional tracker funds which do the same thing.
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 258K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.