We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Putting money where mouth is on fuel economy.

tomstickland
Posts: 19,538 Forumite

in Motoring
Now, I want to take my 1991 BMW off the road for a month or two whilst I rebuild the engine and have the shell resprayed.
For a long time I've been ranting about how weight and size of a car are the enemy of fuel consumption. So I'm going to buy an old and very light car such as 106 with a smallish engine and see what mpg I can coax out of it. I'm planning on spending around £500 on the car and selling it on at the end.
For a long time I've been ranting about how weight and size of a car are the enemy of fuel consumption. So I'm going to buy an old and very light car such as 106 with a smallish engine and see what mpg I can coax out of it. I'm planning on spending around £500 on the car and selling it on at the end.
Happy chappy
0
Comments
-
If you want to see high MPG go for the none turbo diesel a friend had one had got 50+mpg.
The petrol engines I doubt will return 40mpg0 -
Are the Diesel 106s vegetable oil friendly?
http://motors.thisisgloucestershire.co.uk/car-details.lml?car_id=15119951Happy chappy0 -
You're re-building the engine and having the shell re sprayed on your 17 year old BMW...?
There is logic in there somewhere...? Lol...0 -
Yes, it's a hobby. There is a quite an enthusiast scene for the E30 BMW (1984-1991).Happy chappy0
-
Know anyone who wants a 1988 Audi 80?0
-
I know someone who did actually buy one as a toy. There will be a market for one, find an Audi forum.Happy chappy0
-
tomstickland wrote: »Now, I want to take my 1991 BMW off the road for a month or two whilst I rebuild the engine and have the shell resprayed.
For a long time I've been ranting about how weight and size of a car are the enemy of fuel consumption. So I'm going to buy an old and very light car such as 106 with a smallish engine and see what mpg I can coax out of it. I'm planning on spending around £500 on the car and selling it on at the end.
According to this,
http://www.metrompg.com/posts/98-firefly-review.htm
the smallest car on the Canadian market was the Suzuki Swift, 1-litre 3-cylinder. Should be available under £500. They report mileages above 100mpg in US gallons (i.e. more like 125mpg imperial) using specialised techniques.
As far as I can ascertain there aren't any other 3-cylinder cars around.
I'm not sure that driving one of these will be that much fun though.....0 -
I have driven several Peugeot 106 1.0 and 1.1 car. Always got around 45mpg average from them and they were pretty nippy - even on the motorway. I cannot fault them and woudl wholeheartedly recommend them over Fiestas, Corsas, Micras etc.
... oh, and did I mention the handling?? Fantastic!!
by the way, keep the E30 going ... future classics. I am on the lookout for a late E30 325i sport but the prices seem to be going up, up, upIf you found my comment helpful, please click the 'Thanks' button below :T0 -
Oh yes, I'm keeping the BMW, it's a wonderful car to drive, even when being sensible.
I drove a 1.0 106 when I scrapped it for someone and was very entertained by the handling - lift off oversteer on T junctions etc.
I'm wondering about a Diesel and running it on a veg oil mix.Happy chappy0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards