We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Premium bonds - raise limit?
Options
Comments
-
Pendle_Gazza wrote: »I think I'd be tempted to cash mine in if it went any higher (IMHO £30K is too much as it is), and I'm actually one who likes the concept of them and has a small percentage of my dosh in there!
That's an interesting point of view. I suppose there is a valid argument that says the more you raise the personal limit, the more you squeeze out the earnings potential of those who can only afford a small holding.
Dave.... DaveHappily retired and enjoying my 14th year of leisureI am cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.Bring me sunshine in your smile0 -
If they raised the limit now it would look dodgy would it not? It would mean that the gov t was seeking more (net) borrowing. Generally to raise the supply of something you have raise its price (the notional interest rate). PBs are actually still quite cheap for the govt - after allowing for the notional tax foregone.
So it always becomes a balancing act, I suppose? How cheaply can they raise extra PB money - as opposed to other methods. I assume there is a memorandum of understanding between the National Savings and HMG to target a certain rate of growth in PBs - say the nominal growth in GDP - about 6%* a year...
They could go further than that but, because they operate in a competitive market, they can't expect to push their luck and not see the banks (etc) start to complain.
*actually that would mean that (at 3% or so) a willing and gullible public were actually paying more into PBs than ever got paid out in prizes....
and maybe the 'trigger' for a higher maximum holding would also be an increase in the top prize(s)? Human nature being what it is - if the top prize were increased from £1m to £1.5m and the limit increased from 30k to 40k (50k would look dodgy) - people would assume that they had to be more in PBs to get the more value prizes.......under construction.... COVID is a [discontinued] scam0 -
>> It would mean that the gov t was seeking more (net) borrowing.
Yep - that's my point.
>> PBs are actually still quite cheap for the govt
Exactly.
>> Generally to raise the supply of something you have raise its price
Nope - keep the price the same increase the limit. Actually if the supply increases usually the price goes down - look at oil, gold, houses...
>> they can't expect to push their luck and not see the banks (etc) start to complain.
That seems reasonable and could be the reason.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards