We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ex-girlfriend buying me out

2»

Comments

  • chrisjefc
    chrisjefc Posts: 17 Forumite
    If you were not married then the fact there is a child is irrelevant (save for your ongoing CSA obligations).

    The division of the property is regulated by the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996.

    Go to see a solicitor and get their opinion on what a fair figure would be based on all teh facts.

    If you hold teh property as beneficial joint tenants then 99% of the time you will be entitled to 50% of the equity regardless of deposit contributions or mortgage payments.

    i know what your saying

    BUT

    i'm happy with what i'm getting its all very amicable at the moment and thats the way i want it to stay

    just wanted to know if i was gonna get hit with paying tax seeing as im not im happy to let her stay for an extra 5-6k is it worth having a women scorned lol

    maybe if i never had to see her again i might feel different
  • Troubled_Joe
    Troubled_Joe Posts: 278 Forumite
    I completely understand. Only you can put a value on keeping the peace / doing what you think is right.
  • poppysarah
    poppysarah Posts: 11,522 Forumite
    Staying amicable is a fantastic aim!

    You might want to check that you are properly taken off the mortgage, that your money doesn't count towards your lifetime capital gains allowance. (It's only small so not major problem) - but also how you declare it properly if asked. I'd assume you just ignore it but as it's over 10k it'll trigger in some banking system somewhere.
  • mlz1413
    mlz1413 Posts: 3,081 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    chrisjefc i'm going to relay a situation that happen to a friend of mine, not saying it will happen to you, but i hope it makes you think into the long term future.

    Guy is married things not going well about to split up she gets pregnant, he still moves out but they have baby and he is involved everyday. they have a 4 bed lovely family home but he is happy for her to stay there with little one.
    Sometime later (i think within 1st year) he signs house over to her so he can buy a little flat of his own and baby/mother round the corner.

    As soon as house is signed over its up for sale and she moves from Northampton to Dorset. Leaving the guy to travel 200 miles every other weekend to see son, also as didn't have a place down there had to take baby back to B&B or Travelodge.

    If you are going to give up a family home with very little from it make sure you have an agreement in place (if you can and if it is enforceable) or don't do it, wait until child is old enough and then sell home or get bought out.

    Again your split maybe amicable but you have years ahead and situations change.
  • neverdespairgirl
    neverdespairgirl Posts: 16,501 Forumite
    If you were not married then the fact there is a child is irrelevant (save for your ongoing CSA obligations).

    It's not remotely irrelevant. Legally - perhaps it is. But emotionally, and in terms of doing the right thing by his ex and his child, it isn't at all irrelevant.
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • chrisjefc
    chrisjefc Posts: 17 Forumite
    thanks to everyone who replied

    some very good info for me to mull over
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.