We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
HMO Question
BulletCraig
Posts: 85 Forumite
Hi,
Does anyone know the ins and outs of HMO's?
Basically if a property is not HMO registered what are the potential penalties for tenants and landlords if three individuals are staying there? I ask because three of us are looking to rent a property but most of the ones we're keen on aren't HMO registered. What would the legal implications be if, say, only two of us signed the lease and the third just stayed there "off the record" without the landlords knowledge? Obviously I assume he would be well within his right to kick us out should he find out, but in legal terms would we or the landlord be subject to any fines or legal action?
Does anyone know the ins and outs of HMO's?
Basically if a property is not HMO registered what are the potential penalties for tenants and landlords if three individuals are staying there? I ask because three of us are looking to rent a property but most of the ones we're keen on aren't HMO registered. What would the legal implications be if, say, only two of us signed the lease and the third just stayed there "off the record" without the landlords knowledge? Obviously I assume he would be well within his right to kick us out should he find out, but in legal terms would we or the landlord be subject to any fines or legal action?
0
Comments
-
BulletCraig wrote: »Hi,
Basically if a property is not HMO registered what are the potential penalties for tenants and landlords if three individuals are staying there?
The reason possible most of the HMO's you look at dont require to be mandatory licensed. Mandatory licensing only applies to 5 persons, in a 3 storey building, in 2 seperate households and there is a sharing of an amenity.
You should also check with your local authority just to make sure they aren't running additional or selective licensing, which is different from the above. If they are running the either or both selective and additional, then yes there maybe penalties. Ony a handful of councils are rnning these, but do check.0 -
0
-
Interesting. So a three bedroom flat for three individuals doesn't require an HMO at all?The reason possible most of the HMO's you look at dont require to be mandatory licensed. Mandatory licensing only applies to 5 persons, in a 3 storey building, in 2 seperate households and there is a sharing of an amenity.0 -
Isn't it annoying how the Govt bring out laws that it's hard to find out the hard and fast facts on .... they don't make it easy to live and get on with your life do they.
All we ask in life is some easy to find lists/simple details.
Yet what do they do? Get each Council to implement it different then hide that inside different structured websites and bury it inside complex-speak.
A nice grid showing: Councils/yes or no for each scenario and property type
That's what's needed.
But no. Make it complex.0 -
Although the type of property you are describing falls outside the category for mandatory licensing, as Red40 says. The local Council can require licensing for other types - “additional HMO licensing” : if a LL fails to register such a property he could face a fine of up to £20 K plus costs, and any Housing Benefit paid as rent may have to be repaid by the LL.
If two of you have a Tenancy Agreement with a LL , but a third non-signatory is living there permanently as well, you are effectively sub-letting without the LLs consent which will be a breach of the Terms of your Tenancy and could lead to eviction
Are you in England/Wales or in Scotland, by the way?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards