We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Sorry - very naive question...

In the past, people have re-mortgaged their properties against a rise in the market to use the equity in the house to purchase something. If the market crashes, what's to stop people from re-mortgaging their properties and benefiting from a negative-equity situation? I'm sure it's not that simple, but I've been dying to ask...
«1345

Comments

  • ~Beanie~
    ~Beanie~ Posts: 3,043 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    How would someone benefit from a negative equity situation?
    :p
  • lauraaurora
    lauraaurora Posts: 321 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Ok. Bear with me... Say your house was mortgaged for £100K in 1991. Then in 2007 you had it valued for £200K. This meant you could re-mortgage your house for £200K - the mortgage company would give you up to £100K against the value of your house (but your mortgage was then £200k).
    Say you didn't do that, but if in 2009 your house then became worth £80K, could you re-mortgage your house and pay less? Sorry, I'm trying hard to explain myself... It's just if it worked one way, can't it work the other?
    If it helps, it's only a hypothetical question, I'm in Shared Ownership, but it's something I've been wondering about.
  • LillyJ
    LillyJ Posts: 1,732 Forumite
    Sorry that makes no sense at all. If your house is worth 80k, and your mortgage is 100k you still have to pay the 100k
  • lauraaurora
    lauraaurora Posts: 321 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    That's kind of my point LillyJ. It works one way, just not the other. Am I correct in saying that?
  • neas
    neas Posts: 3,801 Forumite
    if house was worth 80k... then rose to 200k.... and henced Mortgaged at 200k (BORROWED 200k from the bank) then.... when it drops back to 80k... the owner would still OWE 200k... to the bank... even if they gave the keys to the bank.... they'd still owe the difference.. i.e 120k.

    Negative equity is bad bad bad... because in addition if your in negative equity you can't remortgage of the SVR.

    Bring on the pain :)... Time to redistribute the wealth back to the kids..
  • LillyJ
    LillyJ Posts: 1,732 Forumite
    That's kind of my point LillyJ. It works one way, just not the other. Am I correct in saying that?
    Well sort of but I wouldn't really describe it like that!
  • LillyJ
    LillyJ Posts: 1,732 Forumite
    neas I just thanked you before reading the bit about "bring on the pain". I thought you had got over wishing homelessness on people?
  • HC_2
    HC_2 Posts: 2,239 Forumite
    However much you borrow is how much you owe.

    It doesn't make any difference what your property is worth.
  • neas
    neas Posts: 3,801 Forumite
    in a market when someone wins.. someone loses.... Because of my age I was predetermined to lose.

    Now its switched so because I dont have a house... I will save money...perhaps "bring on the pain" is a little extreme... I was more hoping this would release BTL back into the market... and allow I and others to buy their family home without being in debt to your eyeballs.
  • LillyJ
    LillyJ Posts: 1,732 Forumite
    neas I am a similar age as you but I don't wish pain on others.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.