South West Trains Penalty Fare

Livingthedream

Stigy wrote: »

Thanks for the welcome!

No problem.

Stigy wrote: »

(obviously if SWT lose at court, then the defendant gets their costs paid back to them).

He'll get prosecuted under 'Fail to show a valid ticket' contrary to National Railway Byelaw 18.1 (2005) which I think both of us know there's no defence and SWT will win.

So the only way for the poster to get out of this is to pay up or to stop it going to court on a technicality.

Stigy wrote: »

I see you get around, lol. Are you a CAG'er too then?

I'm on a lot of forums, but not CAG google search highlighted the thread.

Stigy

Linvingthedream wrote:

He'll get prosecuted under 'Fail to show a valid ticket' contrary to National Railway Byelaw 18.1 (2005) which I think both of us know there's no defence and SWT will win.

Just found this one again as I was bored, lol. I wonder what the outcome was for jjjulian, if anything at this stage of course? It would be nice to know these things, just out of interest really!

Depending on the Questions asked at the time of the offence, could be a 5.3(a) quite easily, as opposed to the byelaw.

Livingthedream

Stigy wrote: »

Just found this one again as I was bored, lol. I wonder what the outcome was for jjjulian, if anything at this stage of course? It would be nice to know these things, just out of interest really!

Totally with you on this one, always nice to have a bit of closure.

There you go stigy as your bored, get your teeth into this thread, one I think made for you. :beer: