We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
TV Licence - cheaper by monthly or annual payments?
John_Gray
Posts: 5,847 Forumite
in Techie Stuff
I asked this question in the relevant TV Licence thread but got no reply, so since it's a techie question (perhaps even using Excel, gasp!) I thought I'd ask it here.
Which is likely to end up costing less -
an annual licence, where you pay the whole amount 'up front',
or monthly payments, where you have a slightly complicated series of payments:
Has anyone done the maths, or should I suggest that Martin's fabled "Premium Bonds calculator" PhD gets involved?!
Which is likely to end up costing less -
an annual licence, where you pay the whole amount 'up front',
or monthly payments, where you have a slightly complicated series of payments:
- in months 1-6 you pay for the first year's licence at 1/6 of the licence fee per month
- in months 6-12 you pay, in advance, for the first half of [next] year's licence at 1/12 of the licence fee per month
- in months 13-18 you pay, in arrears, for the second half of [this] year's licence at 1/12 of the licence fee per month
- ... and so on.
Has anyone done the maths, or should I suggest that Martin's fabled "Premium Bonds calculator" PhD gets involved?!
0
Comments
-
Paying monthly,they are 6 months ahead of you, which is why I pay annually!.....0
-
I don't disagree with your view, but it would be nice to have some calculations to show just how much cheaper was the annual payment method...!0
-
better off paying in installments then if there's no premium on doing it that way as due to the time value of money (£5 is worth less tomorrow than it is today) the first 6 months means you're hanging onto your money longer than you should have had it and the other two split 6 month periods should balance each other out. Will be negligable ie pence that you will be up though.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards