📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Take extra care when using brokers at moment

Options
1235725

Comments

  • If the lenders are fully aware of her position and are willing to take the risk due to the LTV and the interest rate she'll be charged, I can't see a problem.

    If incomes have been made up to make the case look better than it is, then that's very risky.
    I am a Mortgage Consultant and don't like to be told what I can and can't put in a signature so long as it's legal and truthful.
  • homer_j_3
    homer_j_3 Posts: 3,266 Forumite
    If the lenders are fully aware of her position and are willing to take the risk due to the LTV and the interest rate she'll be charged, I can't see a problem.

    The self cert deals are priced accordingly and you are correct that they often reflect the increased risk involved. That said, if that case was to be checked then this response would not be a defence.

    As an adviser, you have a responsibility to know your client. So, how could you be sure this person was earning what they stated? Did it not cross your mind that there could be tax evasion involved? Ignorance cannot form part of your counter argument.

    Conrad, you are a cowboy and the fact that you gloat that you will happily break the law and risk a fine and prison sentence for a measly 5.5k is shocking. You are the kind of person this industry does not need.
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • homer_j wrote: »
    The self cert deals are priced accordingly and you are correct that they often reflect the increased risk involved. That said, if that case was to be checked then this response would not be a defence.

    As an adviser, you have a responsibility to know your client. So, how could you be sure this person was earning what they stated? Did it not cross your mind that there could be tax evasion involved? Ignorance cannot form part of your counter argument.

    Conrad, you are a cowboy and the fact that you gloat that you will happily break the law and risk a fine and prison sentence for a measly 5.5k is shocking. You are the kind of person this industry does not need.

    I'm not sure that you get what I meant. The lender is a Solicitors Practice by the sounds of it. IF they are fully aware of the lack of provable income and don't require any income whatsoever, not even an income figure, due to knowing there is a getout for them, ie very low loan to value but in the mean time they can charge an extortionate rate of interest, then the risk is theirs. It's just like the lady coming to me. If I want the risk in return for the high return on interest and a charge on the house, it's up to me.

    This isn't a bank or building society, they have rightly turned it down as it's hardly good business and they wouldn't want the risk.

    Having said that, I wouldn't want the case that's for sure.
    I am a Mortgage Consultant and don't like to be told what I can and can't put in a signature so long as it's legal and truthful.
  • Dan_Collins_2
    Dan_Collins_2 Posts: 1,377 Forumite
    Yeah right, OK Mr Solicitor, Mrs Woman wants to borrow some money, all other lenders have said clear off and your our last chance, er she earns x but we cant prove it and we cant prove she is self employed!

    Some creative packaging??

    The point I was trying to make is not that the lender should lend, but how or why should she be able to borrow when she is clearly tax evading?!
    :confused:
  • payless
    payless Posts: 6,957 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    To get back to the point of the thread

    -

    When using brokers ( and yes they can help) please note that as well as some lenders only dealing direct , some others are currently quoting better deals direct - if you want full market advice/ research then ensure you get all deals included ( thgis may come as at a fee)

    Also note cashback sites are unlikely to show the no commission deals
    Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as (financial) advice.
  • payless
    payless Posts: 6,957 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Of course the other things mentioined on this thread may indeed put people off using brokers
    Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as (financial) advice.
  • payless wrote: »
    Of course the other things mentioined on this thread may indeed put people off using brokers

    Don't you think that people reading this thread will think that brokers come across more deals than Mr & Mrs Average on £30,000 a year wanting to remortgage their £75000 mortgage on a £150000 property?

    Lenders don't give advice. The majority of Brokers do.
    I am a Mortgage Consultant and don't like to be told what I can and can't put in a signature so long as it's legal and truthful.
  • payless
    payless Posts: 6,957 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Don't you think that people reading this thread will think that brokers come across more deals than Mr & Mrs Average on £30,000 a year wanting to remortgage their £75000 mortgage on a £150000 property?

    Lenders don't give advice. The majority of Brokers do.

    maybe , but I doubt they are indeared the them when they see fees of that nature being mentioned , and what many others see as dodgy .. consumers might think " better to stick to that nice man at the bank- I know he might not be cheapest, but I won't be stung by some wide boy"
    Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as (financial) advice.
  • payless wrote: »
    maybe , but I doubt they are indeared the them when they see fees of that nature being mentioned , and what many others see as dodgy .. consumers might think " better to stick to that nice man at the bank- I know he might not be cheapest, but I won't be stung by some wide boy"

    That nice man at the bank who'll charge them 2% of the advance without blinking, and not tell them that if they paid £495 on another of their products with a fraction higher interest rate, then the total overall cost would be less?
    I am a Mortgage Consultant and don't like to be told what I can and can't put in a signature so long as it's legal and truthful.
  • payless
    payless Posts: 6,957 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Exactly my point .. so isn't this the platform to be showing how good brokers can be , rather than pushing them into the arms of the less qualified / restricted choice banks
    Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as (financial) advice.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.