We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

FT: sub-prime a bigger concern for Britain then previously thought

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/eba43318-0d83-11dd-b90a-0000779fd2ac,dwp_uuid=d355f29c-d238-11db-a7c0-000b5df10621.html

(you might need to register to read this link, it's free to do so though)

Mortgages made to subprime borrowers – home owners with a shaky credit history – account for 10 to 11 per cent of all private homes in six UK towns, data from FitchRatings show.

The towns are: Newport, Wales; Cleveland, Teesside; Wolverhampton; Cardiff; Manchester; and Galashiels, Scotland.
..
Separately, economists at Citi on Friday forecast a 15 per cent fall in UK house prices by the end of 2009.


So much for the worst victims of HPI being in the South - plenty up North going to be affected too it seems.

So Citi are now saying publicly that they see prices down by 15% at end of next year. I wonder what their private forecasts are?
--
Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.
«134

Comments

  • mystic_trev
    mystic_trev Posts: 5,434 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    chucky wrote: »
    let's get this into context - 15% in two years isn't really a crash.

    NO -but the figures over 20% once you've added inflation to the figures!
  • Guy_Montag
    Guy_Montag Posts: 2,291 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    15% is sod all since we're already 5% off the peak last year & dropping. I'd say YoY we'll be 10% by the end of 2008.

    £50bn isn't going to help much, the banks are returning to lending normality not over-tightening.
    "Mrs. Pench, you've won the car contest, would you like a triumph spitfire or 3000 in cash?" He smiled.
    Mrs. Pench took the money. "What will you do with it all? Not that it's any of my business," he giggled.
    "I think I'll become an alcoholic," said Betty.
  • m00m00
    m00m00 Posts: 1,755 Forumite
    the banks have lost billions and billions

    does anyone really think they are in a rush to do exactly the same thing again, even if they could ?
    It's a health benefit ...
  • kennyboy66_2
    kennyboy66_2 Posts: 2,598 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    let's get this into context - 15% in two years isn't really a crash.
    it's a correction that will happen over the next two years - NOT A RECESSION AS YOU SEEM TO TRY TO IMPLY.

    Also. 'Mortgages made to subprime borrowers – home owners with a shaky credit history' how much of the UK market does this cover?

    J K Galbraith said that he should have actually titled his 1954 book The Great Correction rather than The Great Crash.

    Semantics don't really matter when you are trapped in negative equity and are a forced seller.
    US housing: it's not a bubble

    Moneyweek, December 2005
  • m00m00
    m00m00 Posts: 1,755 Forumite
    the banks that have made money, have made it by shorting on the other banks, and very much NOT from mortgage lending.

    if the money lost is so easily tax deductible etc, why are none of them admitting exactly how much they have lost ?

    and why are we still hearing of massive losses being reported ?

    no matter how much the most panglossian of commentators wants, things really are different this time, and not in the way the bulls want.
    It's a health benefit ...
  • kennyboy66_2
    kennyboy66_2 Posts: 2,598 Forumite
    Ladbrokes are betting 5/6 that prices will fall by 10% this year based on the Halifax HBOS Standardised Quarterly Average House Price.

    I'm hoping we will be more than 1/2 way there by the time of the Q2 survey.
    US housing: it's not a bubble

    Moneyweek, December 2005
  • WTF?_2
    WTF?_2 Posts: 4,592 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    m00m00 - you're right but take my below points into consideration when you do say that.

    the banks have lost millions, there are also other banks who have made billions and billions out of this...

    So far, sub-prime writedowns are at something like > $200 billion (total losses could be up to $1 trillion according to IMF estimates).

    If you can show that other banks have made an extra 200 billion dollars recently I think the markets would all be very interested. :D

    The facts are that most of the sub prime losses represent real 'lost' money to the banks. Either through defaulted debts or assets that are not worth what they booked them as. This has a very direct impact on their balance sheet and is why governments are frantically doing everything they can to bail them out with taxpayer cash.
    --
    Every pound less borrowed (to buy a house) is more than two pounds less to repay and more than three pounds less to earn, over the course of a typical mortgage.
  • JonnyBravo
    JonnyBravo Posts: 4,103 Forumite
    Mortgage-free Glee!
    kennyboy66 wrote: »
    Ladbrokes are betting 5/6 that prices will fall by 10% this year based on the Halifax HBOS Standardised Quarterly Average House Price.

    I'm hoping we will be more than 1/2 way there by the time of the Q2 survey.


    Thanks for that. Am having a slice of that!
  • taffr
    taffr Posts: 1 Newbie
    EmmaH warned you back in April 2006....people didnt listen then and looks like you 'brokers' who were selling sub prime morgages [and advising on this site] and making a few bucks out of selling this crap didnt like what she said....and had her thrown off the site....

    shame on you all.

    http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showthread.html?t=186002&highlight=redstone

    Look at all her post...genius, kind, respectful, warning and forward thinking!

    Taff R
  • pickles110564
    pickles110564 Posts: 2,374 Forumite
    NO -but the figures over 20% once you've added inflation to the figures!
    20% aint enough in our area to get FTB's on the ladder but at that amount several BTL's I know will be increasing their stock.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.