We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
People Cannot Become Rich by Selling Ever More Expensive Houses to One Another (FT)
PasturesNew
Posts: 70,698 Forumite
Flicking through the FT this morning over my usual fresh croissants partaken on the patio at home (no, found it online really)... I thought this article was worthy of a mention:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/68636996-0cad-11dd-86df-0000779fd2ac.html
Which is the crux of the perception problem about wealth that people think they've got.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/68636996-0cad-11dd-86df-0000779fd2ac.html
It is high time the British realised a people cannot become rich by selling ever more expensive houses to one another
Which is the crux of the perception problem about wealth that people think they've got.
0
Comments
-
The economy we have at the moment reminds me of the place in Gullivers Travels where the economy is based on everybody doing each other's washing.
Very good piece, I like Martin Wolf.0 -
LOL/ Yes, that would be a splendid fit.
I've never read the book though.0 -
PasturesNew wrote: »LOL/ Yes, that would be a splendid fit.
I've never read the book though.
You definitely should, it's one of the great political satires, along with Animal Farm....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0 -
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/alice_miles/article3768099.ece?Submitted=true
And the above is an excellent piece in The Times about the Brown/Darling plan to keep us buying overpriced houses off each other. I find it seriously scary...0 -
Finance is a third of GDP so our economy partly depends on us buying and selling houses to one another as well as swapping shares or currency. Also think of all the builders, decorators and other trades that have been kept in work because of the obsession with property. They were all dying off as everyone was going DIY so we have instead become a service economy where every pays someone else to do the things they don't want to or can't do. Shame I can't outsource a boring job and pay a cheap minion to do it for me while I sit at home

Money the banks and we have isn't real money any more. It is all inflated and deflated in millions of transactions each day. All wealth is fundamentally an illusion and has been for years. The write downs for the sub prime create holes in a balance sheet that isn't real either. Who can say what anything is really worth with any of these complex financial instruments any more anyway? If someone pays X for a house then it is worth X in a free market. 2 minutes later someone else might pay X+Z or X-Z for an identical house. A valuer can come along and decide it is in fact worth Q so who is right? 2 minutes later another valuer can come along and decide the actual value is F because it is a remortgage not a purchase and he wasn't swayed by any of the previous figures.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards