We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Was he mis-sold?

My OH, who is self employed, has just found out it's no longer compulsory to have Employers Liablity insurance as he is a 'one man band', this came into effect on 28th February 2005, have checked this out with HSE and he fits the criteria for exemption. My question is should his insurance company have pointed this out to him when it came into effect? Has he been mis-sold for the past 2 years?

He has been with the same company for 20 years.

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,266 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    My question is should his insurance company have pointed this out to him when it came into effect?

    No.
    Has he been mis-sold for the past 2 years?

    No.

    Insurance companies provide the products but they do not provide the advice. If your husband bought direct or used an execution only broker then it is his responsibility to know. If your husband used a broker for advice then the broker is responsible.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • rosiedee
    rosiedee Posts: 269 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    He does use a broker. They advised him he needed Employers Liability insurance when he became a limited company a few years ago. Should they not have informed him when this was no longer a compulsory requirement?
  • Quentin
    Quentin Posts: 40,405 Forumite
    Employers liability has not been compulsory for limited companies only employing their owner (as long as he has more than 50% of the shares) since January 1999.

    He should keep his certificates for the years he took out the insurance for many years (40), just in case he develops any work related illness over the years that can be traced back.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.