We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Joint tenants or Tenants in Common

Hi,

Me and my long term boyfriend are buying a leasehold flat and have been asked by the solicitor which way we want to buy: Joint tenants or Tenants in Common. My parents will be contributing a large deposit amount to help us but this is going to be drawn up as a formal loan by the solicitor. The aggreement is when the flat is sold we'l pay back the loan ammount plus what interest would have been gained had it been in a savings account.

Anyway, although we've been together about 5 years you never know what might happen in the future and as we're not married I'm inclined to go with Tenants in Common. I also think that if something were to happen to one of us the other would be saddled with the full mortgage costs, etc on their own instead of the other set of parents (being the next of kin) being obliged to contribute half.

What do you think? Is there anything glaringly obvious I've not considered and do you think it's a sensible choice?

Thanks

Comments

  • LillyJ
    LillyJ Posts: 1,732 Forumite
    I am going tenants in common (been with partner 7 years so similar sort of situation, and getting loan off parents) but I had discussed on another thread, the fact that you can get life insurance that will give the survivor enough money to buy the next of kin out.

    Well that is what we decided anyway. Someone who is more knowledgable legally will help you. (ps be prepared for some stick, I got told on the other thread that I was "very strange" for being tenants in common with a partner and that perhaps we shouldn't be buying at all)! All I want is to protect my and my parents finances, even 30 year marriages end so you have to prepare for the worst!
  • Clarita
    Clarita Posts: 38 Forumite
    Yeah I agree. As romantic as it is to not give a moments thought to what "could happen" I think it'd be pretty stupid to automaticly assume everything will stay the same forever! That's why people take out insurance for everthing!

    Thanks LillyJ
  • LillyJ
    LillyJ Posts: 1,732 Forumite
    Yep exactly. It's not like we sit their splitting up tesco value loaves of bread 50-50 or anything, it just seems sensible to do so when there are hundreds of thousands of pounds at stake!

    It is hardly a gesture of love to go joint tenants anyway!
  • Its equally important to get your pre-nuptual agreement drawn up professionally.
  • Clarita
    Clarita Posts: 38 Forumite
    Maybe it would be if we were getting married
  • trudiha
    trudiha Posts: 398 Forumite
    My partner and I are planning to get married in June, well I say planning but we haven't don't any actual planning yet so it might not happen until November by that's by the by. We are in the process of buying a place and decided to go for the 'in common' rather than 'joint', although both of us list the other as the main beneficiary in our wills. That means that if (when) either of us die the other get the dead one's part of the house.

    However, if we both die together (at the very same second) I'd be deemed to have died first because I'm a little older than her, that would mean that the dead her would get all of the house and then it would go to her family. Now I like her family well enough but I don't feel I know them well enough to give 'em half a house. So I've willed it to my ex.

    Additionally, if one of us were to go into a care home and needed to pay fees, the 'in common' thingy ring fences the other half's estate to pass on to whoever they want.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.