We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Joint Ownership - 1 Name on Mtge??
kungfurasta
Posts: 5 Forumite
My other half and i are buying a house, she is getting a mtge for £112k and i am putting in £55k cash. We will both be paying the mtge and all bills equally. I am not going on the mtge as its just quicker and easier as i am self employed.
Am i entitled to any interest on the £55k if the property increases in value and we then sell?
Can you confirm if there is any other legally binding contract we can have to say we are are joint owners and to specify our individual percentage shares in the property and what will happen in the event of us seperating?
All the sol. has come up with is a Declaration of Trust......
My Sol. says......"The mortgage must be in both names or the title must be in one name only. The declaration of trust is merely a document that would protect your financial contribution into the property. It is not registered at the Land registry it only protects in the event that you split up. It is not legally binding on the title"
What should i be doing here?
Many thanks.
S.
Am i entitled to any interest on the £55k if the property increases in value and we then sell?
Can you confirm if there is any other legally binding contract we can have to say we are are joint owners and to specify our individual percentage shares in the property and what will happen in the event of us seperating?
All the sol. has come up with is a Declaration of Trust......
My Sol. says......"The mortgage must be in both names or the title must be in one name only. The declaration of trust is merely a document that would protect your financial contribution into the property. It is not registered at the Land registry it only protects in the event that you split up. It is not legally binding on the title"
What should i be doing here?
Many thanks.
S.
0
Comments
-
Your solicitor is right; if there are two names on the deeds, then there must be two names on the mortgage. You are then jointly and severably liable. It's clean for the mortgage lender if they need to repossess - they won't be in to fighting you for shares of the proceeds.
If you own the property as tenants in common, you can assign who owns what percentage of the property. If you split up, you can't dictate how much the property is worth or how much of the mortgage has been repaid, therefore who actually owns what percentage, so the deed of trust will probably contain some interesting sums.
Otherwise you buy the house yourself in your name and see a whole of market mortgage broker about a self-cert mortgage.Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
0 -
I was in exactly your situation - we got the size of mortgage they would lend on my partner's salary alone, but still took it out as a joint mortgage. Only his payslips etc. were needed for lending purposes which was a lot simpler as I didn't have sufficient years of accounts. But definitely put the mortgage and deeds in joint names if it's a joint purchase.:T:j :TMFiT-T2 No.120|Challenge started 12.12.09|MFD 12.12.12 :j:T:j0
-
You might be able to register a restriction against the title that effectively says that no disposition of the proeprty can be made without your consent. See what OH's solcitor says about this.
If you had a deed of trust that effectively said that although the property was held by OH it was agreed that the beneficial interests should be divided in certain proportions then this restriction would protect your interests and prevent a sale (other than by the mortgage lender in possession) without your consent.RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0 -
Richard_Webster wrote: »You might be able to register a restriction against the title that effectively says that no disposition of the proeprty can be made without your consent. See what OH's solcitor says about this.
If you had a deed of trust that effectively said that although the property was held by OH it was agreed that the beneficial interests should be divided in certain proportions then this restriction would protect your interests and prevent a sale (other than by the mortgage lender in possession) without your consent.
Thanks for that Richard. At present we are using the same solicitor, i.e. our conveyancing sol. should i be getting my own sol to look after my interests??
Which would you recommend..a restriction against the title or a deed of trust??
Cheers,
S0 -
Assuming in England/Wales same solcitor can do this if OH instructs him to do so but you can have your own separate solicitor if you want.Thanks for that Richard. At present we are using the same solicitor, i.e. our conveyancing sol. should i be getting my own sol to look after my interests??
Which would you recommend..a restriction against the title or a deed of trust??
You would need Deed of Trust to set out the shares and restriction to make sure you get your share. If restriction there then any buyer's solicitor will want it removed and you would need to be contacted to lift it.RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0 -
I would suggest you ought to have separate solicitors. In NZ, that's the standard recommendation for couples purchasing a house if they aren't married. Your interests aren't the same, that's the problem, so one person is unlikely to be able to give each of you the best advice. A deed of trust setting out your shares is probably what you will be advised to do, although it is better that the legal title reflects the correct situation, as that will bind everyone.Mortgage started on 22.5.09 : £129,600Overpayments to date: £3000June grocery challenge: 400/6000
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
