Fluoride in tap water

BernardM

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7547385139152764985&hl=en

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6558018788602619012&q=source%3A000657595458690869950&hl=en

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3919013320928866777&q=source%3A000657595458690869950&hl=en

BernardM

Volcano wrote: »

Don't try and rationalise with Bernard. I'm not sure what he does with his time but he pops up on this thread occasionally with his outdated and irrelevant links (I think he's a member of the "it's all a conspiracy!" brigade).

No conspiracy, its all reported news. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/tests-for-drugs-in-tap-water-945268.html
http://www.nysun.com/new-york/city-lawmakers-find-alarming-report-of-drugs/72602
http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/0310-11.htm
http://www.wpxi.com/consumer/15556634/detail.html

http://www.chicagotribune.com/health/chi-water-testing-14-jul14,0,4303601.story

coffee_prince

The information really is mixed, I first came across this issue in my alternative news magazine that i read, but there is some warrant to complain as some countries have rejected fluoridation...

Me, I would rather not have the choice taken away from me, I'd rather have plain water in my taps

BernardM

http://www.californiaskywatch.com/documents/htmldocs/drinking_water.htm

BernardM

Volcano wrote: »

Don't try and rationalise with Bernard. I'm not sure what he does with his time but he pops up on this thread occasionally with his outdated and irrelevant links (I think he's a member of the "it's all a conspiracy!" brigade).

Without our consent. What else are they doing

http://www.californiaskywatch.com/about.htm

http://www.californiaskywatch.com/news.htm

Volcano

BernardM wrote: »

Without our consent. What else are they doing

http://www.californiaskywatch.com/about.htm

http://www.californiaskywatch.com/news.htm

Utterly embarrassing, conspiratorial nonsense. You've gone from the sublime to the ridiculous.

BernardM

Volcano wrote: »

Utterly embarrassing, conspiratorial nonsense. You've gone from the sublime to the ridiculous.

I think your posts are more intended to provoke an indignant response in the reader.

anudeglory

BernardM wrote: »

I think your posts are more intended to provoke an indignant response in the reader.

And yours a suspension of higher reasoing, rationality and reason?

MrCarrot

tbs624 wrote: »

The fact remains that you can dose those who need/want fluoride individually. For it to be added to *everyone's* drinking water is wrong IMO. It is not the role of water companies to deliver "medicine" to us all without our consent.

In addition to those simply who do not want to drink water laced with a cheaply obtained industrial waste product, there are those who have specific health issues, such as thyroid problems, who will be badly affected by a decision to mass medicate with fluoride via our water supplies.

I agree. I think you should have a choice whether you want flouride in your water or not. When someone no longer has a choice or control over something, bad things happen :A

I've heard arguments for and against flouride. I'm kind of sitting on the fence, although I would have thought that given the improvements in general dental hygene, flouride in the water supply is not that important any longer?

BernardM

Volcano wrote: »

Utterly embarrassing, conspiratorial nonsense. You've gone from the sublime to the ridiculous.

When you say conspiracy what do you mean, its all openly talked about.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XiG-rKVBI3s&feature=player_embedded