We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How safe are apples?

Blacksheep1979
Posts: 4,224 Forumite

in Techie Stuff
So ever apple fanboy on here constantly goes on about how apple macs are safe, unhackable etc etc. So how long exactly will a new fully patched and up to date software wise apple mac stand up against hackers vs fully patched windows and linux machines? Which will be penetrated first?
http://www.macworld.com/article/132733/2008/03/hack.html
Food for thought.....
http://www.macworld.com/article/132733/2008/03/hack.html
Food for thought.....
0
Comments
-
i don't think its true that macs are more secure than windows pcs, just the relatively small userbase makes it less worthwhile to the hackers.Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.0
-
Also apples contain some cyanide."She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
Moss0 -
superscaper wrote: »Also apples contain some cyanide.
Organic ones shouldn't. Overall I'd say apples are safer or at least less harmful than most processed foods.
But seriously, Apple computers are fairly safe because they have such a small market-share that hackers don't target them much. Why bother writing a virus or trojan that at best only has a chance of infecting maybe 10% of desktop/laptop computers, when by targetting Windows you have a chance of infecting over 80% (a few people using PCs will be running a Linux variant and that is even less targetted than Mac OS, because people capable of using Linux tend to be at least a little geeky and will know what to watch out for).
You can't be complacent though- Apple Macs do still need a firewall and AV software to be considered safe. They are probably safer than Windows XP/Vista for a total computer-novice, though.0 -
You can't be complacent though- Apple Macs do still need a firewall and AV software to be considered safe. They are probably safer than Windows XP/Vista for a total computer-novice, though.
Macs OS X 10.4 Tiger and 10.5 Leopard (and earlier OSs too) include a very strong Firewall as part of their standard install. If I recall correctly almost 99.99% of the viruses that affect Mac OS X, are solely targeted at Microsoft applications, which by themselves can't harm the OS.
I have several Macs running different flavours of OSX and I seldom bother scanning for Microsoft viruses. In the 6+ years I've been using OSX I've only encountered a few viruses. Not one was targeted at the OS, rather they were OS-independant Microsoft macro viruses...
If you use a secure browser like FireFox with Jscript then you stand very little chance of getting hacked or inadvertently downloading a viruses."Money is truthful. If a person speaks of their honour, make sure they pay in cash."0 -
i don't think its true that macs are more secure than windows pcs, just the relatively small userbase makes it less worthwhile to the hackers.
nope the root/user seperation of the unix platform they are based on make them a lot more secure.
basicly it prevents users from writing anything to a path that could be exicuted so if you download a virus it just sits there doing nothing
that said you can secure a linux box to nsa standards very easily and be virtualy impervious, or just go totally mental and openbsd with its one vunerability in a decade.0 -
nope the root/user seperation of the unix platform they are based on make them a lot more secure.
basicly it prevents users from writing anything to a path that could be exicuted so if you download a virus it just sits there doing nothing
that said you can secure a linux box to nsa standards very easily and be virtualy impervious, or just go totally mental and openbsd with its one vunerability in a decade.
More secure than XP with it's default admin rights, but a similar system is built into Vista with it's annoying but useful UAC.
Whatever OS you use though the biggest security risk is the person using it.It's my problem, it's my problem
If I feel the need to hide
And it's my problem if I have no friends
And feel I want to die0 -
-
A hacker in an legit organised competition hacked into a macair within 2 mins using an undisclosed flaw.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/infoworld/20080327/tc_infoworld/96676
You may want to read the first post in this thread! :rotfl:It's my problem, it's my problem
If I feel the need to hide
And it's my problem if I have no friends
And feel I want to die0 -
alexjohnson wrote: »Can anyone hijack your machine to make it dial up very expensive lines? Nope.
How many people nowadays are still on dial up though?"She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
Moss0 -
Just looked it up, apparently at last check last year it was 11.6%. And I'm guessing that's made up of all computer type users including macs so actual windows users will be less. Hardly anything worth considering significant in terms of security risk.
Has anyone said macs are not safer?"She is quite the oddball. Did you notice how she didn't even get excited when she saw this original ZX-81?"
Moss0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards