We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Life insurance query
Gers
Posts: 13,595 Forumite
A relative has told me that the Life Insurance company has told her (sorry..) that the monies are to be paid to the deceased's estate rather than to her - she is the second named beneficiary.
Is this normal? Is this true? I am struggling to believe this and would welcome any help.
thanks
Is this normal? Is this true? I am struggling to believe this and would welcome any help.
thanks
0
Comments
-
Depends on how the life policy is written.Is this normal?
If the policy is not in trust and single life or not owned by another then the proceeds are paid into the estate.
If the policy is in trust or is joint life or ir owned by another then the proceeds are not paid into the estate.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Depends on how the life policy is written.
If the policy is not in trust and single life or not owned by another then the proceeds are paid into the estate.
If the policy is in trust or is joint life or ir owned by another then the proceeds are not paid into the estate.
Thanks for that - I will make further enquiries, but what do you mean by 'owned by another'???0 -
what do you mean by 'owned by another'???
Life assurance has a policy owner and a life assured (or multiple owners or multiple life assureds). The owner doesnt need to be the life assured. It can be used to help with payments not being held up with probate or IHT issues where a trust document may not be required.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Life assurance has a policy owner and a life assured (or multiple owners or multiple life assureds). The owner doesnt need to be the life assured. It can be used to help with payments not being held up with probate or IHT issues where a trust document may not be required.
Many thanks! HOWEVER... if there is a second named person does that not make it a joint life thing?
Thank goodness I'm not the person involved but it is in the family.0 -
You can have have single life, joint owner but in most cases it would be joint life, joint owner.I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards