📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Northern Wreck Nationalised

Options
What a disaster...read Anatole Kaletsky in the Times...this government will take every investor for a ride. Watch the queues form again as every investor runs for cover.

Comments

  • fizzypop wrote: »
    What a disaster...read Anatole Kaletsky in the Times...this government will take every investor for a ride. Watch the queues form again as [strike]every investor runs for cover[/strike]. the media over-hype the situation. Again.

    Hope that helps ;)
    Conjugating the verb 'to be":
    -o I am humble -o You are attention seeking -o She is Nadine Dorries
  • cloud_dog
    cloud_dog Posts: 6,326 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Sooooo, if the Government hadn't stepped in and bank-rolled your huge losses what would the SP be now????

    I think you should aim your frustration at the real culprits; those who made the reckless investment decisions, not the government.
    Personal Responsibility - Sad but True :D

    Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone
  • jon3001
    jon3001 Posts: 890 Forumite
    Great - every tax-payer is now an investor in the subprime housing market.
  • cloud_dog wrote: »
    Sooooo, if the Government hadn't stepped in and bank-rolled your huge losses what would the SP be now????

    .


    http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/66aea6ca-de44-11dc-9de3-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1


    "
    These Spanish banks have in many respects the same business model as Northern Rock; in autumn 2007 they faced the same difficulty in financing their assets. But they have not been punished by the Spanish authorities as Northern Rock has been punished by the UK authorities and the government. The Spanish government has not threatened to nationalise them, in spite of the huge advances they have received from the ECB.

    The one correct point in the argument for nationalising Northern Rock was that the value of its assets, and hence its continued solvency, depended on the Bank of England loan. If Northern Rock had been forced last September to dispose of its assets as quickly as its depositors were withdrawing cash, those assets would have been sold at far less than their true value in normal circumstances and Northern Rock would have gone bust.

    But central banks exist for the purpose of preventing runs or, at any rate, ensuring that runs are met by ­lender-of-last-resort loans so the hurried liquidation of assets can be avoided. That is what is meant by the proposition, repeated in hundreds of textbooks, that “the central bank is lender of last resort to the banking system”.

    If Northern Rock does repay its loan from the state in full but its shareholders receive nothing, the British government’s actions would amount to robbery under the law. "
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.