We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
FSA Compensation Thoughts

baldbloke_2
Posts: 236 Forumite
I note that the Savings & Investments for Saga are 'provided by' Birmingham Midshires who offer Savings in their own name of course. They in turn are a 'division of' Halifax plc who again obviously offer savings in their own right. Just a (very) daft question but if BM collapsed one day (and I know it ain't gonna happen) would a person having savings with both Saga and BM be covered for both investments separately by the compensation scheme and therefore receive 2 x £2000 + 90% etc. etc.
Additionally do the Halifax and BM count as separate providers for the purposes of the FSA. Would investments with both be considered as 2 separate claims if the unthinkable happened.
Excuse this early morning flight of fancy but the idea of spreading one's load to cover such eventualities would be somewhat negated if a person might lose several holdings in one companies failure.
Additionally do the Halifax and BM count as separate providers for the purposes of the FSA. Would investments with both be considered as 2 separate claims if the unthinkable happened.
Excuse this early morning flight of fancy but the idea of spreading one's load to cover such eventualities would be somewhat negated if a person might lose several holdings in one companies failure.
0
Comments
-
I suspect that you're on the right lines. Subsidiaries generally trade independently of parent companies and if one fails the other is protected from creditors [etc]. The corollary of this principle is that the same coustomer banking with a parent and with its subsidiary is a separate 'creditor' from protection purposes. Therefore you'd get two lots of 'protection' rather than only one. [So I'm 99% sure you are correct]
Anyone know?.....under construction.... COVID is a [discontinued] scam0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards