Does a bank have obligation to tell you about rate changes on account?

MarkyMarkD

Everyone after gtsss has posted at least 247 times - and that's you, nilrem.

There's no point in going off on irrelevant tangents - the OP's comments were wrong, and gtsss pointed out why. End of story, surely?

Incidentally, I didn't understand what your this is money quote actually meant - did you need to quote a bit more to put it into context? What "sneaky move" were the banks apparently making?

nilrem_2

MarkyMarkD wrote: »

Everyone after gtsss has posted at least 247 times - and that's you, nilrem.

There's no point in going off on irrelevant tangents - the OP's comments were wrong, and gtsss pointed out why. End of story, surely?

Incidentally, I didn't understand what your this is money quote actually meant - did you need to quote a bit more to put it into context? What "sneaky move" were the banks apparently making?

The bit of the story about Sneaky moves was irrelevant to this thread and had I quoted the whole thing it would have given you more ammunition to use against us less 'savvy' posters making less than useful comments!

FWIW with only 247 posts I still consider myself a 'new boy'!

MarkyMarkD

You're more than welcome to join the "old boys (and girls)".

Nice dog, by the way.