We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Worthless Landlords Insurance from Endsleigh
Dunscrimpin
Posts: 47 Forumite
A warning.
I have had occasion to make a claim over the severe damage caused to my flat by tenants, and their uninvited live in "guest". The claims department at Endsleigh swung into action by immediately quoting, " Page 9, just under the section detailing the exclusion of "Any damage in Northern Ireland," paragraph (b) states, " Loss or damage caused by You or any other person who is living in Your Property" is not covered by your policy." I take it, that if, extending this principle, I were to be driving a car involved in an accident, I would similarly be disqualified from claiming, on the basis, that I was living in the car at the time. Have the company in question, the right to charge me money for expressly not insuring me for what I asked them to provide me a policy for, i.e. any damage to my property, caused by the tenants? Is this catchall exclusion a general feature of such policies, which in my opinion, would mean we are once again being duped by companies eager to see our money, but not prepared to live up to their advertised commitments?
Chastened, saddened, more world weary than before,
D.
I have had occasion to make a claim over the severe damage caused to my flat by tenants, and their uninvited live in "guest". The claims department at Endsleigh swung into action by immediately quoting, " Page 9, just under the section detailing the exclusion of "Any damage in Northern Ireland," paragraph (b) states, " Loss or damage caused by You or any other person who is living in Your Property" is not covered by your policy." I take it, that if, extending this principle, I were to be driving a car involved in an accident, I would similarly be disqualified from claiming, on the basis, that I was living in the car at the time. Have the company in question, the right to charge me money for expressly not insuring me for what I asked them to provide me a policy for, i.e. any damage to my property, caused by the tenants? Is this catchall exclusion a general feature of such policies, which in my opinion, would mean we are once again being duped by companies eager to see our money, but not prepared to live up to their advertised commitments?
Chastened, saddened, more world weary than before,
D.
Thanks to all who've gone before, and those yet to arrive.
0
Comments
-
Hi,
This is my original thread, relating to my dissatisfaction with a policy for tenanted buildings insurance.
D.Thanks to all who've gone before, and those yet to arrive.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.9K Spending & Discounts
- 246.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 602.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.9K Life & Family
- 260.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards